I don't think you're missing anything. But the numbers can't be trusted, 
optimistically or pessimistically. For example, we don't know how many 
asymptomatic people are really presymptomatic. If 25-50% of the 
tested/confirmed cases are thought to be asymptomatic, and that amount 
translates into the general population, then the number is larger than 2m/7.5b. 
Or, even if those we labelled asymptomatic were presymptomatic, the 80% mild 
symptom number will rise above 80%.

Those of us considering never shaking hands again in our lifetime, or never 
leaving home again, or whatever insane extreme are _catastrophizing_. It's a 
sign of low tolerance for ambiguity ... which I guess is typical for dorks like 
us ... but we should at least recognize it in ourselves.

My prescription for Nick is to turn off the internet, smoke a little weed, and 
start reading a big fat novel. 8^)


On 4/9/20 3:34 PM, Gary Schiltz wrote:
> From what I've read, it seems to me that if the only way for the virus to be 
> stopped is for enough people to become immune that it runs out of hosts in 
> which to reproduce. Immunity could develop in at least three ways: a) be 
> vaccinated (probably 2+ years off); b) have natural immunity (probably a low 
> percentage, besides who wants to risk it?); or c) be infected and recover 
> (thus *presumably* making them immune).The only purpose of flattening the 
> curve is to try to reduce mortality (and maybe even reduce the permanent 
> damage done to the body) by keeping the medical systems from becoming 
> overwhelmed. Given how few people have been infected and then either died or 
> recovered (fewer than 2 million infected out of 7.5 billion, i.e. 0.026%), we 
> could repeat this curve flattening exercise a thousand times before it would 
> burn itself out.
> 
> Seems to me we have to either wait for a vaccine, or resign ourselves to the 
> fact that we are going to get infected. Or just stay out in the cloud forest 
> like I'm doing and never see anyone face to face again. Am I missing 
> something?


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... 
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to