No teasing. Seriously. When you said "A color blind person lacks the code to see the numeral hidden within the diagram", explicitly using the phrase "within the diagram", that is exactly what I mean when I say "inside the diagram". "Within", "inside", and "on" are synonymous.
Please note that we're still talking in the CONTEXT of my re-statement of what you and EricC seem to believe. If/when that context changes, I'll try to let you know because the semantics of my language will change, no matter how hard I try to keep it fixed. On 5/18/20 2:35 PM, [email protected] wrote: > So you are teasing me, a little bit, right? I understand "internal" only if > it contains no surplus beyond "hidden". I suppose that if you mean by inside > only "a hidden subset of" then I have to go along with it. But now I have to > think about whether your meaning has anything to do with what Frank and > others mean when they talk about privileged access to a causal subjective > mind. -- ☣ uǝlƃ -- --- .-. . .-.. --- -.-. -.- ... -..-. .- .-. . -..-. - .... . -..-. . ... ... . -. - .. .- .-.. -..-. .-- --- .-. -.- . .-. ... FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
