I actually don’t understand why people consider the social lubrication provide 
by non-verbal, in-person communication a good thing.   It seems to be widely 
believed that it is good if people don’t offend one another, and that in-person 
communication makes that easier.
If there is a lack of context in a message, and some of the contexts would be 
offensive to some audience, then it is just as true in person.
If someone smiles when they say it, really what is the difference?   Maybe what 
they are really doing is trying to bias the distribution of received 
interpretations to benign ones, while at the same time disseminating and 
normalizing the not-so-benign interpretations?

From: Friam <[email protected]> on behalf of Russ Abbott 
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, The Friday Morning 
Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, June 6, 2020 at 10:05 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] millenarianism

Ok. Thanks, Dave.

On Sat, Jun 6, 2020, 8:39 AM Prof David West 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Russ,

I apologize for any insulting sarcasm.

I forgot that most readers of those words did not share the context behind them 
and therefore did not see the amused smile on my face as I wrote them. The 
context was the first few meetings of the Mother Church immediately following 
the election. The mood of those meetings and the tenor of the discussion was 
pretty much exactly as my apocalyptic paragraph described.

I was perplexed, and amused, that such intelligent people would react that way. 
Nick, in particular, called me on that amusement, accused me of schadenfreude 
and we all engaged in very friendly, not sarcastic, not insulting, discussion.

davew


On Sat, Jun 6, 2020, at 12:16 AM, Russ Abbott wrote:
What bothered me about davew's post was the insulting sarcasm.

A Trump was sounded (pun intentional) in the heavens, opening the Doors of Hell 
and loosing the Dogs of Chaos. The end was clearly nigh. 'He' had his finger on 
the button of nuclear annihilation! 'He' is a Russian agent! 'He' is 
certifiably insane (narcissistic personality disorder at minimum)!  More 
concerning, the conviction that once installed 'He' would never leave. American 
was at the verge of a precipitous drop into Fascism.

Basically, destruction was at hand The Learned Authorities confirmed every 
fear. The Forces of Good were marshalled, and salvationary doctrine was issued. 
The Good marched, multiple crusades were launched to retrieve the Holy Land 
from the Infidel(s).

The system of beliefs, the reading of omens, the predictions and the 
prognostication of the Millenarians of 1899,199,and 2012 survived but a few 
days or months. That of 2016 persists to date, and will persist, I am pretty 
sure, for another four years.

Millenarianism is a mind set, a perspective, that takes hold in a culture, or 
subculture, and predisposes the manner in which other events, other aspects of 
the world, are interpreted. It affects how, and by what process, people make 
decisions, individually and collectively.

COVID, and the response thereto, is an example. From the point that people 
began taking it seriously, it was interpreted as yet another apocalyptic 
disaster to be laid at 'His' door. Correct courses of action are given credence 
in direct proportion to their opposition to what 'He' might have said or opined.

Presumably, davew doesn't believe that the preceding characterizes the way any 
living human being thinks. So why pretend that it does other than to insult 
people? And why does he want to insult people? We don't need any more of that. 
We are already fully supplied with insults from the insulter-in-chief. Let's 
not make things worse.

-- Russ

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 10:19 PM 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Well, to be completely honest, I understand that particular itch rather less 
than some others.  But David reads insatiably, often listens quite carefully 
and insightfully to what others say.  So I value him, even though he seems to 
have this odd theory that shock increases the quality of argument.  I guess, 
maybe, sometimes it does.



Thanks for your own provocations, over the years.



Nick



Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/






From: Russ Abbott <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2020 11:05 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] millenarianism



OK.


-- Russ Abbott
Professor, Computer Science
California State University, Los Angeles





On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 8:36 PM 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Aw come on, Russ.  We all have itches.  Let him scratch.



Nick



Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/




From: Friam <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On 
Behalf Of Russ Abbott
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2020 7:31 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] millenarianism



I completely agree. It is assertive, bombastic, and stated without nuance. More 
importantly, it's primarily name-calling with little useful substance.







On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 6:23 PM Prof David West 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I was asked some questions just as I was leaving vFRIAM today. The following is 
a continuation of the thoughts that i started to articulate then. I can pretty 
much predict that no one will agree with my observations, but hope that 
vituperation will be kept to a minimum.



My last year at St. Thomas, I team taught an honors course with a Professor of 
Catholic Theology. The topic was "Millenarianism in1899 and 1999." His 
contribution centered on religious movements, including some within 
Catholicism, and mine was ethnographic.



The groups we studied and taught about were about 2/3 preparing for the End 
Times, the other third focused more on what you might call a socio-cultural 
phase change, a transformation of society.



The role of an anthropologist is "to make the strange familiar and the familiar 
strange." A prime example of the latter is found in the various studies of the 
Nacerima.



"The main belief of the Nacirema appears to be that the human body is ugly and 
that the only way to prevent it from growing weak and diseased is to practice 
powerful rituals devoted to this purpose. Every household has one or more 
shrines devoted to this goal. The more powerful people in the society have 
several ritual shrine rooms in their houses.  ... While almost every family has 
at least one shrine in the home, the ritual ceremonies associated with it are 
not family ceremonies but are private and secret. The rites are normally 
discussed only with children, and then only during the period when they are 
being initiated into these mysteries."



If I were to write an ethnography of FRIAM, one chapter would be devoted to 
Millenarianism, especially as practiced at the Mother Temple.



A calendrical event precipitated the overt expression of millenarian behavior 
and thought. instead of the turn of a century (1899, 19990 or the end of a 
calendar (2012), it was the election of 2016.



A Trump was sounded (pun intentional) in the heavens, opening the Doors of Hell 
and loosing the Dogs of Chaos. The end was clearly nigh. 'He' had his finger on 
the button of nuclear annihilation! 'He' is a Russian agent! 'He' is 
certifiably insane (narcissistic personality disorder at minimum)!  More 
concerning, the conviction that once installed 'He' would never leave. American 
was at the verge of a precipitous drop into Fascism.



Basically, destruction was at hand The Learned Authorities confirmed every 
fear. The Forces of Good were marshalled, and salvationary doctrine was issued. 
The Good marched, multiple crusades were launched to retrieve the Holy Land 
from the Infidel(s).



The system of beliefs, the reading of omens, the predictions and the 
prognostication of the Millenarians of 1899,199,and 2012 survived but a few 
days or months. That of 2016 persists to date, and will persist, I am pretty 
sure, for another four years.



Millenarianism is a mind set, a perspective, that takes hold in a culture, or 
subculture, and predisposes the manner in which other events, other aspects of 
the world, are interpreted. It affects how, and by what process, people make 
decisions, individually and collectively.



COVID, and the response thereto, is an example. From the point that people 
began taking it seriously, it was interpreted as yet another apocalyptic 
disaster to be laid at 'His' door. Correct courses of action are given credence 
in direct proportion to their opposition to what 'He' might have said or opined.



Arcana, e.g. the Master Question List that Nick distributed and the "official 
pandemic models," are consulted. Convoluted combinations of interpretations of 
elements of that arcana, determine how questions like, "Is it safe to walk the 
streets of Wuhan on June 6, 2020? Simpler ways to answer that question are 
available but ignored. For example, some 10 million people, over half the 
population, in Wuhan have been tested. Only 300, all of them asymptomatic, have 
tested positive. What are the odds of meeting one of those positives on my 
stroll to the 'wet market'?



------



I know the preceding is assertive, bombastic, and stated without nuance. But, 
it is not wrong, in the sense that if I were to write a book, i could document 
and argue point by point to the same conclusions.



davew






- .... . -..-. . ...- --- .-.. ..- - .. --- -. -..-. .-- .. .-.. .-.. -..-. 
-... . -..-. .-.. .. ...- . -..-. ... - .-. . .- -- . -..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
- .... . -..-. . ...- --- .-.. ..- - .. --- -. -..-. .-- .. .-.. .-.. -..-. 
-... . -..-. .-.. .. ...- . -..-. ... - .-. . .- -- . -..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/


- .... . -..-. . ...- --- .-.. ..- - .. --- -. -..-. .-- .. .-.. .-.. -..-. 
-... . -..-. .-.. .. ...- . -..-. ... - .-. . .- -- . -..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
- .... . -..-. . ...- --- .-.. ..- - .. --- -. -..-. .-- .. .-.. .-.. -..-. 
-... . -..-. .-.. .. ...- . -..-. ... - .-. . .- -- . -..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to