Nick - > > Examining my own experience, I can only say that you are correct that > there is direct pleasure in developing an argument, as “tactile” as > the pleasure of forming Silly Putty into smooth balls or blowing > bubbles with bubblegum. > You do know which is which I hope? I don't know WHY they developed Silly Putty to have such a similar color, I can still taste the stuff... and it isn't nearly as benign as chalk, crayons, lincoln logs, or horsehoof glue. > > But that pleasure is eliminated IMMEDIATELY and completely, if I > imagine that nobody will ever read and understand what I wrote. > That’s a paradox, and one I don’t entirely understand. > Thus my blathering here when I could (should?) just as well be directing all (most) of this into my journal, my blog, my memoirs, or my Great Post-Murrican Novel.
- Steve
- .... . -..-. . ...- --- .-.. ..- - .. --- -. -..-. .-- .. .-.. .-.. -..-. -... . -..-. .-.. .. ...- . -..-. ... - .-. . .- -- . -.. FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
