Thanks so much for posting this, Russ! I finally got around to the Guardian 
article. I'm at risk for confirmation bias because I tend to think 
consciousness is a lossy, multivalent compression of interoceptive composites. 
And the extent to which one can [⛧] feel what it's like to be some (other) 
thing depends fundamentally on whether or not you a) have similar elemental 
interoceptive pathways, b) whether they compose in a similar way, and c) 
compress to a similar result. That allows for a spectrum of similarity from 
extremes of, say, a rock to a bat to another human.

In any case, it's on the wishlist: 
https://bookshop.org/books/the-hidden-spring-a-journey-to-the-source-of-consciousness/9780393542011


[⛧] Feeling like something else is subtly different from *inferring* how 
something else feels (or from being manipulated into similar feelings).

On 2/6/21 5:15 PM, Russ Abbott wrote:
> About to be published.
> 
> From a review 
> <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/feb/05/the-hidden-spring-by-mark-solms-review-the-riddle-of-consciousness-solved>
>  by Oliver Burkeman:
> 
> Burkeman: Using poignant case studies of neurology patients – including 
> children born with brain damage, yet plainly still capable of sadness and joy 
> – [Solms] argues persuasively that consciousness ultimately arises not in the 
> cortex, the seat of advanced intelligence, but in the more primitive 
> brainstem, where basic emotions begin.
> 
> Russ: In other words, consciousness exists far down the tree of life.
> 
> Burkeman: To the best of my understanding, the gist [of the book] is that 
> feelings are a uniquely effective and efficient way for humans to monitor 
> their countless changing biological needs, in extremely unpredictable 
> environments, to set priorities for action and make the best choices so as to 
> remain within various bounds – of hunger, cold and heat, physical danger, 
> social isolation, etc – outside of which we can’t survive for long. Doing all 
> that without feelings, and doing it as rapidly as survival requires, would 
> take so many computational resources that it would lead to a “combinatorial 
> explosion”, demanding levels of energy a human could never muster.  
> 
> Here's Nick Lane's blurb on Amazon 
> <https://www.amazon.com/Hidden-Spring-Journey-Source-Consciousness/dp/0393542017/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8>:
>  (If you know Nick Lane, you know he is worth listening to.)
> 
> "At last the emperor has found some clothes! For decades, consciousness has 
> been perceived as an epiphenomenon, little more than an illusion that can't 
> really make things happen. Solms takes a thrilling new approach to the 
> problem, grounded in modern neurobiology but finding meaning in older ideas 
> going back to Freud. This is an exciting book."
> ― Nick Lane, author of /The Vital Question/  

-- 
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to