Marcus -
Steve writes:
< Arguments for generational rather than Individual/personal growth and
transformation...
“I don’t think we should try to have people live for a really long time,” Musk
recently told Insider. “It would cause asphyxiation of society because the truth
is, most people don’t change their mind. They just die. So if they don’t die, we
will be stuck with old ideas and society wouldn’t advance.” >
Maybe not?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-01769-4
It isn't clear to me that merely loosening up neural pathways so that they can be re-created yields healthy growth as such. I'd like to think it can be, but as the neo-luddite that I tend toward, I can't help but seeing the myriad ways it can go wrong as well. This negative ideation is probably a self-referential example of the topic itself.
Following RECs original subject: I'm interested I suppose in understanding more-better the myriad scales and dimensions of adaptivity of "Life Itself", with the human (individual as well as cultural) experience being the one most relevant to my own life, but not exclusively.
OpenPGP_0xFD82820D1AAECDAE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
