Vitalik Buterin remarked, “An emotional part of me says that once you start 
going down that way, professionalizing is just another word for losing your 
soul” [1]
That sounds plausible.  However, I have long thought that an important part of 
productivity is to find consciousness-lowering habits.   Just attach to 
whatever is front of you and forget about the motivations and the big picture.  
For one thing, it is rare that one can really change the big picture.  For two 
it is necessary to get in the critical path of a process to disrupt it.  The 
nihilistic episodic personality doesn’t have to impose a narrative before going 
on excursion.  Too much evaluation and reflection and one’s action as a virion 
cannot move forward!   There is plenty of time to wake up a judgmental brain 
process once embedded.  But what are judgements really informed by if sampling 
is based on an outsiders’ view?   This kind of ties into Glen’s local reset 
idea.

[1] https://time.com/6158182/vitalik-buterin-ethereum-profile/

From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 10:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Selective cultural processes generate adaptive heuristics



Marcus -

Steve writes:

< Arguments for generational rather than Individual/personal growth and 
transformation...

“I don’t think we should try to have people live for a really long time,” Musk 
recently told Insider. “It would cause asphyxiation of society because the 
truth is, most people don’t change their mind. They just die. So if they don’t 
die, we will be stuck with old ideas and society wouldn’t advance.” >



Maybe not?



https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-01769-4

I do think there is plenty of room for individual growth/transformation in one 
lifetime and perhaps Psi research will (continue to) provide yet-more tools for 
facilitating that.

It isn't clear to me that merely loosening up neural pathways so that they can 
be re-created yields healthy growth as such.   I'd like to think it can be, but 
as the neo-luddite that I tend toward, I can't help but seeing the myriad ways 
it can go wrong as well.  This negative ideation is probably a self-referential 
example of the topic itself.

Following RECs original subject:  I'm interested I suppose in understanding 
more-better the myriad scales and dimensions of adaptivity of "Life Itself", 
with the human (individual as well as cultural) experience being the one most 
relevant to my own life, but not exclusively.



.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to