No, not a good idea. Normally I am not the one that throws the shoe but this sounds like quantum woo to me.And Jochen-Kochen-Specker sounds terrible in German. Like "Jochen cooks bacon" in wrong syntax. Knochen means bone in German, Kochen means cooking and Speck means bacon. Nope.-J. -------- Original message --------From: Jon Zingale <[email protected]> Date: 9/27/26 7:26 PM (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] LNC Impossibility Theorem Perhaps a fruitful direction for your project would be to seek analogs to the Kochen-Specker theorem of QM? You could call it the *Jochen-Kochen-Specker theorem of consciousness*, wherein you can establish that what fails is the attempt to place every individual perspective into one complete, context-independent assignment of experiential facts.We would then need to specify what counts as a context, what facts are being assigned, and which consistency requirements make a global assignment impossible. Then you and I could argue about the ontological status of Hilbert space, its physicality.Tangentially, this paper by Chris Isham, Topos Methods in the Foundations of Physics, touches on some of what I have in mind: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.3564
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-.. FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
