> You did not answer my question about 'pmatrix'.
Actually, I did. See attached file at
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07421.html
But I don't know why you fight for 'array'. How many people are using
plain TeX? And how hard would it be to add
\def\textbf#1{{\bf #1}} or
\def\frac#1#2{{#1 \over #2}}
to your plain TeX .sty file?
> And in general
> it seems that you replace portable (common to plain TeX and
> LaTeX) constructs by LaTeX specific ones.
You didn't want to add LaTeXFormat. And I don't think that it makes any
sense to keep plain TeX stuff.
It's much harder to redefine a construction like
{\it ...}
than it is to redefine
\textit{...}
In fact, to treat the group/ungroup stuff in a better way, one should
probably transfrom first to a tree structure and remove unnecessary
double groups. But I was not in the mood to rewrite the whole thing just
because of these grouping issue.
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
