Oui....ca m'arrange pas cela..... Si au moins wanadoo/oragne publiait du SPF....ca aiderai....
Est-ce que qqn a une expérince bonne avec SPF ? Le 24/11/06 9:38, « Michel Arboi » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On Fri Nov 24 2006 at 08:49, Xavier Beaudouin wrote: > >> Normalement, mais je me souviens plus de la RFC... le ehlo doit être >> un FQDN valide qui pointe soit sur un A, soit sur un MX avec >> évidement un PTR associé. > > Je n'avais pas lu la suite du RFC 2821 § 4.1.4 : > > The SMTP client MUST, if possible, ensure that the domain parameter > to the EHLO command is a valid principal host name (not a CNAME or MX > name) for its host. If this is not possible (e.g., when the client's > address is dynamically assigned and the client does not have an > obvious name), an address literal SHOULD be substituted for the > domain name and supplemental information provided that will assist in > identifying the client. > > An SMTP server MAY verify that the domain name parameter in the EHLO > command actually corresponds to the IP address of the client. > However, the server MUST NOT refuse to accept a message for this > reason if the verification fails: the information about verification > failure is for logging and tracing only. -- Sebastien Gioria [EMAIL PROTECTED] SG41-GANDI --------------------------- Liste de diffusion du FRnOG http://www.frnog.org/
