On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, 20:48:40 EST, Bryan Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/06/2012 07:49 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:50:23AM +0000, Clint Adams wrote: > > > Do you understand how a sane and honest person might disagree > > > with you given the preponderance of evidence? > > > > I agree and this is one of the criticism we need to address. But > > saying, in reply to this, "see, we/you're lying" is not enough to > > actually solve the issue. > > You're right, it doesn't solve the issue, it supplies visibility of the > issues. Had a thought after sending the last email, sorry. > > the *alternative* solution, but for the sake of searching from > > common ground, we need to be creative and explore all the various > > possibilities.) > > Colocation could be done in such a way that the free and nonfree > packages aren't part of the same structure. Which is to say I perhaps nonfree.debian.(org|net) could be used. Thanks, kk
_______________________________________________ Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss
