On 12/5/06, Nick FitzGerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For copyright infringement? Well, kinda -- specifically under the DMCA. Pointing out that ROT13 is not really an "effective" encryption mechanism with which to "secure" copyrighted digital content is itself NOT allowed under the DMCA (showing what a shitty little piece of law it really is -- it's a law so bad it has to make some forms of potential criticism of it illegal).
The charge then probably related to the breaking of the security, not copyright. And, to put the focus back onto the original discussion, this is an orange. The apples were one's ability to photograph publicly viewable structures or persons. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
