Robert said to me:
>" I'm sure if you ping the 10.10.167.40, you'll find that it's only a
couple hops away.
I am in Chicago now and using Visual Route's trial edition it tells me
10.10.167.40 can be found in Australia. Here is the trace:
Address of Hop Name of Hop Location
10.10.10.1 (unnamed) (Private) (My inside interface) my comment
10.20.0.1 (unnamed) (Private) (RCN DHCP server) my comment
207.229.191.130 mart-h1.chi-mart.il.cable.rcn.net Herndon, VA, USA
207.172.19.41 ge0-0-2.core1.chsl.il.rcn.net Herndon, VA, USA
207.172.19.151 ge3-2.core1.sbo.ma.rcn.net Worcester, MA, USA
207.172.15.114 ge4-1.core2.sbo.ma.rcn.net Worcester, MA, USA
207.172.19.37 pos5-0.core2.nyw.ny.rcn.net New York, NY, USA
207.172.15.67 tge1-2.core4.nyw.ny.rcn.net New York, NY, USA
207.172.19.107 tge2-1.aggr1.nyw.ny.rcn.net New York, NY, USA
- (unnamed) (An unnnamed hop) my comment
10.10.167.40 (unnamed) (Private) Australia according to Visual Route's
location service
I have not been able to confirm this. I do appreciate your help and
hope that this stimulates some more ideas as I am perplexed.
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Graham [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 1:15 AM
To: [email protected]; Richard Golodner
Subject: Re: [funsec] Any ideas?
RFCs are not the law. You can break them. I use so-called
routable/non-private (although not allocated) addresses for my internal
network. ISPs route non-routable/private addresses. Specifically, they use
such addresses as part of their management network: they assign private
addresses in the 10.x.x.x space to routers, modems, etc.
>From what I understand, cable-modem providers give a 10.x.x.x address to
their cable-modems for management purposes. I believe the last time I had a
cable modem, I saw these 10.x.x.x addresses exposed on my Ethernet.
I run traceroute through my tethered cellphone, and find that the phone
company assigns 192.168.x.x addresses to routers. nmap scans confirm other
machines in that so-called "private" "non-routable" range.
--- On Fri, 4/3/09, Richard Golodner <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Richard Golodner <[email protected]>
> Subject: [funsec] Any ideas?
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, April 3, 2009, 2:44 PM
> When I do:
>
> Show IP Nat Translations, I see this coming from my
> wife's laptop.
>
>
>
> Pro Inside global Inside local
> Outside local
> Outside global
>
> tcp 24.148.6x.xxx:2022 10.10.10.98:2022
> 10.10.167.40:2967
> 10.10.167.40:2967
>
>
>
> How does this 1918 address space route
> across the internet?
> 10.10.10.98 is her machine. Any ideas are welcome and there
> are no chat
> programs allowed on our (MY) LAN, so I have ruled that out.
>
> Thank you and have a great weekend, Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
