Les Bell: > Yes indeed. Geolocation inside network 10 would be an achievement, if it > could be done at all. It mostly depends on CIDR, which came long after > those early address allocations.
Haha! Yeah, it would be right up there with geolocation inside 172.[16-31], or within 192.168. Would require more than just CIDR understanding, would require maybe a gypsy fortune-teller. > Does anybody attempt to do geolocation inside network 9, for example - > which is IBM? I doubt anyone ever sees those addresses on the Connected > Internet. Seems unlikely; even if those addresses did get exposed here and there, the address-to-location map is presumably both closely-held and rapidly-changing. DC
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
