On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 07:45:33PM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > There isn't anything particular about Google that makes me think of them > as a company that is particularly stellar (or not) on matters of security, > [...]
I largely concur with this viewpoint, however: a reliable surface indicator of poor underlying security (at any entity) is the amount of abuse that emanates from that entity. And Google is well-known as a prolific spam source; has been for several years. This speaks poorly of their clue level and diligence -- neither of which are up to acceptable professional standards. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
