On 5/31/11 5:11 PM, der Mouse wrote: >>> Spammers are sociopathic monsters. >> No, they are merely entrepreneurs with no morals and a criminal >> tendency. > > I think you are in furious agreement here. > > No morals generally implies a criminal tendency, since crimes are > mostly things that are, except for their antisocial and/or immoral > attributes, attractive one way or another. (Unattractive things > generally don't get done enough to be made into crimes.) > > I also think that "no morals" _is_ "sociopathic" in many respects. >
I can see your point if we discuss it philosophically, however, these things have clinical definitions. A spammer may be a regular human being such as you or I, with very similar psychology. A sociopath very likely isn't. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
