On Tue, 31 May 2011 18:10:40 +0300, Gadi Evron said: > I can see your point if we discuss it philosophically, however, these > things have clinical definitions. A spammer may be a regular human being > such as you or I, with very similar psychology.
Highly unlikely. Doing things (like spamming) just because you want to even when society disapproves is pretty much the *definition* of sociopath. Sure, there may be spammers who really hate themselves and are only doing it because they have to pay for their child's kidney transplant, but I think it's safe to exclude both of them from the analysis. The rest of them are sociopaths who like the money and don't care what society thinks.
pgp0OOsU91Dfq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
