I'd like to place this discussion in another context by considering 
expanding HAL's Extended Fusebox architecture to the extreme of having a 
single fuseaction in each directory/folder/fusebox.

Here the fuseaction is implicitly defined by the directory location (so no 
fuseaction variable is needed), no CFSWITCH is needed, and Circuits.cfm is 
more extensive and now serves to define the XFAs.

Comments?   Advantages?   Disadvantages?

best,  paul

At 04:56 PM 3/27/01 -0500, you wrote:
>i think it's important to also keep in mind that even when things are nested
>several fuses deep, that that is by the architect's choice....you can as
>easily make everything be nested one deep simply by expanding the
>top-level's Circuits.cfm file.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to