"Too"? Don't you mean "two"? Mike, Mike, Mike. You must be more clear, or
else....
:)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:36 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>
>
> XFB moves the responsibility of circuit navigation to the root of a home
> application. XFB further allows circuits to control their own destiny if
> they are stand alone or nested based on whether or not the home
> application
> sees that the circuit exists in its world.
>
> I have too more sentences but did not want to incite the inquisition.
>
> Mike Craig
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Ashworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 1:02 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: Re: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>
>
> I kind of agree with Stan too. It seems like there is too much complexity
> involved for something as simple as nesting circuits ... then again, that
> makes me think I'm not understanding what XFB is all about. Can
> anyone sum
> it up in 1 or 2 sentances?
>
> Todd Ashworth --
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "McCollough, Alan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 12:18 PM
> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>
>
> | Ahhh Stan. Welcome back, buddy! I'll side with Stan, I'm just
> not 'getting
> | it' on the whole XFB thing. Maybe I'll stick to the old version of
> Fusebox,
> | but I'll just add in some BLINK tags for show...
> |
> | > -----Original Message-----
> | > From: Stan Cox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> | > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:14 PM
> | > To: Fusebox
> | > Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
> | >
> | > <html><DIV>I read the lots of emials but then I cant read them for the
> | > things that you guyz are saying when you typed it. I still am
> using
> | > the Cold Fuzian and my boss say to use fuz box or else i am not
> going
> | > to be do work at my rockin' job so I try to lern as hard as I can
> try
> | > but it is hard to lern it. I try to read all these
> emalis but then
> i
> | > do not get it when you say XBF and stuff like that.
> before it was
> no
> | > XBF but then now it is lots of these messajes. i dont want to be
> an
> | > meenie but i am getting upset about the lots of emails
> to here that
> i
> | > do not be figureing out. Geocities is simple and I am very very
> very
> | > good programmer for it. Cold Fuzian is simple but
> harder at it but
> i
> | > can do cool things in it like put hello #name# in the tables.
> | > Fusebox is simple because i don't have lots of rules to
> | > follow. I hope fusebox stays simple because if it is not
> | > simple i will not be able to be using it for my rockin programming
> | > skillz. </DIV>
> | > <DIV> </DIV>
> | > <DIV>FreeI is the rocking horse that rocks the free
> programing interntet
> | > programming!</DIV>
> | > <DIV> </DIV>
> | > <DIV> </DIV><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN
> Explorer
> | > at <a
> | >
> href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p>
> </html>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
