I actually meant to include the word "many" but then realized that "but"
really wouldn't fit so that means the second part of the sentence would be
run-on and although I don't usually run-on in my sentence structure, this
error should in no way reflect on my skills in grammer and syntax (though
you might not really believe that to be the case, and that would be ok
because you really don't know me or my writing style)....what was I saying?
Anyway, I merged two thoughts erroneously. I'll try to be more careful in
the future. I think trying to explain XFB in two sentences threw me too.
Right...too.
Sigh, I'll just shut up now
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Nat Papovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:02 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
"Too"? Don't you mean "two"? Mike, Mike, Mike. You must be more clear, or
else....
:)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:36 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>
>
> XFB moves the responsibility of circuit navigation to the root of a home
> application. XFB further allows circuits to control their own destiny if
> they are stand alone or nested based on whether or not the home
> application
> sees that the circuit exists in its world.
>
> I have too more sentences but did not want to incite the inquisition.
>
> Mike Craig
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Ashworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 1:02 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: Re: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>
>
> I kind of agree with Stan too. It seems like there is too much complexity
> involved for something as simple as nesting circuits ... then again, that
> makes me think I'm not understanding what XFB is all about. Can
> anyone sum
> it up in 1 or 2 sentances?
>
> Todd Ashworth --
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "McCollough, Alan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 12:18 PM
> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>
>
> | Ahhh Stan. Welcome back, buddy! I'll side with Stan, I'm just
> not 'getting
> | it' on the whole XFB thing. Maybe I'll stick to the old version of
> Fusebox,
> | but I'll just add in some BLINK tags for show...
> |
> | > -----Original Message-----
> | > From: Stan Cox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> | > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:14 PM
> | > To: Fusebox
> | > Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
> | >
> | > <html><DIV>I read the lots of emials but then I cant read them for the
> | > things that you guyz are saying when you typed it. I still am
> using
> | > the Cold Fuzian and my boss say to use fuz box or else i am not
> going
> | > to be do work at my rockin' job so I try to lern as hard as I can
> try
> | > but it is hard to lern it. I try to read all these
> emalis but then
> i
> | > do not get it when you say XBF and stuff like that.
> before it was
> no
> | > XBF but then now it is lots of these messajes. i dont want to be
> an
> | > meenie but i am getting upset about the lots of emails
> to here that
> i
> | > do not be figureing out. Geocities is simple and I am very very
> very
> | > good programmer for it. Cold Fuzian is simple but
> harder at it but
> i
> | > can do cool things in it like put hello #name# in the tables.
> | > Fusebox is simple because i don't have lots of rules to
> | > follow. I hope fusebox stays simple because if it is not
> | > simple i will not be able to be using it for my rockin programming
> | > skillz. </DIV>
> | > <DIV> </DIV>
> | > <DIV>FreeI is the rocking horse that rocks the free
> programing interntet
> | > programming!</DIV>
> | > <DIV> </DIV>
> | > <DIV> </DIV><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN
> Explorer
> | > at <a
> | >
> href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p>
> </html>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
