Me too, it has been easier for me to pull my app together with XFB and I
use fusebox miniapps inside of tits organization. I just saw my type but
had to leave it cause I am roflmao.
Gary Morin wrote:
> Just a comment on XFB being complex, its NOT. I'm new to Fusebox, I got the
> book, it helped a bit, I read Hals Fusebox 101 and I'm away, it so simple.
>
> To call any fuse in any nested circuit from any circuits just set the xfa
> to 'circuit.fuseaction', with circuit being the circuit name and fuseaction
> the fuseaction. Now what's hard about that.
>
> With regard to $$$$ just be glad it $s and you don't have to multiply by 1.5
> to get �
>
> Gary
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McCollough, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2001 18:25
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>
> Hah, I know the way technology works. Confusion breeds money. Complexity
> breeds money. That's why you don't see a lot of high-dollar Mac consultants.
> I think Hal figured out that folks went through his initial class and paid
> big wad. SoOoOo, in order to feed off of the chaos, he cooks up this complex
> XFB thing. Of course, for $$$$$$$$$$ he will sit ya down for 5 days and get
> your head straight... heh heh heh.
>
> I only wish I did it first! I've just gotta come up with something really
> complex, yet cool enough where I can start up a seminar business and roll
> people through the doors day after day. Maybe in the summertime. Alaska is
> beautiful in the summertime. Folks would pay to come up here. Winter
> however, uh, I think I'll stick to my day job...
>
> All you folks who went to Hal's classes, did you start to receive a lot of
> calls from folks selling timeshares, or vitamins, or options on futures on
> aluminum? Heh heh heh, actually, I'm thinking about putting in a request to
> check out one of his classes, too, so you can stamp "sucker" on me, too. But
> I wanna end up a smart sucker!
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hal Helms [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 1:57 AM
>> To: Fusebox
>> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>>
>> Because we can walk and chew gum at the same time?
>>
>> Hal Helms
>> Team Allaire
>> [ See www.halhelms.com <http://www.halhelms.com> for info on training
>> classes ]
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: BORKMAN Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 5:18 AM
>> To: Fusebox
>> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>>
>>
>> Look,
>>
>> Stan as ever makes a great point. Why are we thinking of moving to XFB
>> when
>> we haven't even migrated standard FuseBox to ASP, PHP and GeoCities?
>> Surely
>> we should be spreading FB as a general philosophy throughout the entire
>> world of high-level web development, before we begin over-refining it for
>> just one environment.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stan Cox
>> .....
>> I hope
>> fusebox stays simple because if it is not simple i will not be able to
>> be using it for my rockin!
>>
>> .....
>>
>> IMPORTANT NOTICE:
>> This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used
>> by
>> the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally
>> privileged
>> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
>> mistaken transmission to you. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
>> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must
>> not
>> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
>> recipient. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to
>> this e-mail or attachment to it.
>>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
