I am using frames and fusebox on an intranet site. We have 4 developers
that work on the site. The use of frames has never been a problem. It is
almost as straightforward as a non-frames site. The only difference is that
I have one additional file, fra_mother.cfm, to maintain the frameset. I
think that maybe the first day I was working with frames and fusebox, it was
a little difficult to grasp, but once it clicked, I never looked back.
-----Original Message-----
From: Janine Jakim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 9:02 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: OT: Tables versus Frames
I hate to start a huge debate, but, I was recently talking to a seasoned
fusebox developer. He told me it was best not to use frames with fusebox-
that it gets too convoluted and difficult with all the different
fuseactions, etc. He said it would be much better to use tables to display
the pages as if there are frames there. But I don't like the fact that with
tables all the info is reloaded each time! (This discussion of course took
place after I struggled to get my frames to work perfectly, but I'm not
bitter...) So what do people think? Do the large sites become unmanageable
using frames? Are tables the way to go?
Humbly yours,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
