I can tell you a dozen reasons (that have nothing to do with fusebox)
not to use frames. However, I just got finished creating an application
that used frames and fusebox. My philosophy is basically this: If it
will work just as well without frames, don't use frames.
See also http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?ShakerQuote
Patrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Janine Jakim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 9:02 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: OT: Tables versus Frames
>
>
> I hate to start a huge debate, but, I was recently talking to a seasoned
> fusebox developer. He told me it was best not to use frames with fusebox-
> that it gets too convoluted and difficult with all the different
> fuseactions, etc. He said it would be much better to use tables
> to display
> the pages as if there are frames there. But I don't like the
> fact that with
> tables all the info is reloaded each time! (This discussion of
> course took
> place after I struggled to get my frames to work perfectly, but I'm not
> bitter...) So what do people think? Do the large sites become
> unmanageable
> using frames? Are tables the way to go?
> Humbly yours,
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
