I don't have the experience in FB to support the claims but I do know this.
"Frames are evil" and I would ONLY recommend them in an environment where
you have absolutely no other choice. IFRAMES are cool but not cross-browser.
:(
There are some good books out there on User Interface design. 99% say frames
are evil. It's "unnatural experience" for a human to have their work split
in half and move in different directions. (course it sounded much more
"psychologically profound" in the book but hey cut me some slack here...lol)
My couple cents
-----Original Message-----
From: Janine Jakim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 9:02 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: OT: Tables versus Frames
I hate to start a huge debate, but, I was recently talking to a seasoned
fusebox developer. He told me it was best not to use frames with fusebox-
that it gets too convoluted and difficult with all the different
fuseactions, etc. He said it would be much better to use tables to display
the pages as if there are frames there. But I don't like the fact that with
tables all the info is reloaded each time! (This discussion of course took
place after I struggled to get my frames to work perfectly, but I'm not
bitter...) So what do people think? Do the large sites become unmanageable
using frames? Are tables the way to go? Humbly yours,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
