After reading Nat's presentation on fusebox n frames, I became hooked on
using frames (where they are appropriate) in my applications. You can add
all sorts of neat functionality with frames. I do not agree however with
using frames on a regular web site, only in applications.
Funny how frames make a regular website feel kinda cheesy but make an
application seem more robust.
Russ Johnson
Web Environment Services
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida
Work: 904-905-7130
Mobile: 904-534-8162
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Open source software - with no walls and fences, who needs windows and
Gates?"-- Anonymous
-----Original Message-----
From: Janine Jakim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 9:02 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: OT: Tables versus Frames
I hate to start a huge debate, but, I was recently talking to a seasoned
fusebox developer. He told me it was best not to use frames with fusebox-
that it gets too convoluted and difficult with all the different
fuseactions, etc. He said it would be much better to use tables to display
the pages as if there are frames there. But I don't like the fact that with
tables all the info is reloaded each time! (This discussion of course took
place after I struggled to get my frames to work perfectly, but I'm not
bitter...) So what do people think? Do the large sites become unmanageable
using frames? Are tables the way to go?
Humbly yours,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
