Yes, that is excellent thinking. Could we take this over to fbsteer so we don't make this list too noisy? We have lots of corporate folks who will get in trouble with PHBs if the traffic gets too much.
-----Original Message----- From: Nathan Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:54 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: FuseQ Yes! Yes! Yes! Modular, maybe even with an add-in API? -nate -------------------------- Nathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 515.288.3667 www.ipmvs.com -----Original Message----- From: John Beynon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu May 09 09:43:44 2002 Subject: RE: FuseQ Personally I was really excited about the security concepts Steve/Hal were coming up with a few months back that led to the arguments over Permissions and roles - and then it all went quiet. I think we've got to be careful about pumping the core files with stuff that just wouldn't get used. An interesting idea would be something along the lines of how Apache works, in that it's extensible. Being able to plug in modules into the core files would be something very neat...it's like the SESconverter, some use it, some don't have a need for it. Possibly having a config file for the fusebox which somehow incorporates these extensions into the core files and opens up additional variables would be very neat - DISCLAIMER: These are just thoughts I'm having whilst I'm typing, nothing more! Let's keep the core nice and trimmed...the way it should be :) John. > -----Original Message----- > From: craig girard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 09 May 2002 15:42 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FuseQ > > > What about your security model? I'd love to see that in the > core files. > > Craig > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "hal helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 7:04 PM > Subject: RE: FuseQ > > > > Actually, we have a spec so that anyone who writes to that spec can > > share their code. That doesn't mean that people can't make > changes or > > try innovations. I agree that a strict "don't ever change the core > > files" is easier to work with, but there are real needs for > > new/different functionality. For example, in order to > better implement > > Model View Controller, I really needed the ability to > execute multiple > > fuseactions in the same HTTP request scope. So FuseQ does this. But > > you can take a standard FB3 app and use the techspedition core file > > with it and it will run just fine. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 4:42 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: FuseQ > > > > > > <FB3soapbox> > > so now we need stickers so we know if a module will work > with windows > > 95, or NT?? oh sorry FB3, FB3FEX, or FB3fuseQ??? I always > thought the > > "rule" > > was do not mess with the core if you plan on sharing code (free or > > not)...if anyone can make their own core file then why do > we have this > > new > > community? why do we have these big debates? ANARCHY FOR ALL!!! > > </FB3soapbox> > > > > <note> > > yes I know not all modules change the core just there so make a > > point</note> > > > > At 03:30 PM 5/8/2002 -0500, you wrote: > > >ANYONE CAN MAKE THEIR OWN FUSEBOX FILES > > > > > >which is what they have done. They have made files that are > > >compliant > > >to the current spec, but extend it. As long as you > provide ALL of the > > >functionality provided by the current files, you are in > compliance > > >with Fusebox 3. > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: craig girard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:34 PM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: FuseQ > > > > > > > > >Ok, just went to this site...................is > techspedition making > > >their OWN fusebox files? > > > > > >whats with that? > > > > > >Craig > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "John Beynon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 11:34 AM > > >Subject: RE: FuseQ > > > > > > > > > > It's gonna be here > > > > http://www.techspedition.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=code.Main I > > > > reckon, > > > > > > > > John. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Rich Tretola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: 08 May 2002 14:43 > > > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > > Subject: FuseQ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone where I can get a copy of the new FuseQ stuff that John > > > > > presented at CF_North? > > > > > > > > > > Rich > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > > > __ > > > > > ___ > > > > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET > > > > > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For > > > > > further information visit > http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > __ > > > > _ > > > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET > > delivered > > > > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further > > information > > >visit > > > > http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > end > > *********************************************************** > > You can have it good > > You can have it cheep > > You can have it quick > > Pick two > > > > - Sign in a studio I worked in once. > > *********************************************************** > > Michael "Maxx" Porter > > Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion 5.0 Certified Developer > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET > delivered > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further > information visit http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
