Yes, I'm working on that right now, Craig. Trying to take some of the
good ideas of others, add in the cflogin stuff new to CF6 and have
declarative security. One of our new steering committee members, Ben
Edwards, and Wells Burke are working with me on this, too. Should be
interesting...

-----Original Message-----
From: craig girard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FuseQ


What about your security model?  I'd love to see that in the core files.

Craig

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "hal helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 7:04 PM
Subject: RE: FuseQ


> Actually, we have a spec so that anyone who writes to that spec can 
> share their code. That doesn't mean that people can't make changes or 
> try innovations. I agree that a strict "don't ever change the core 
> files" is easier to work with, but there are real needs for 
> new/different functionality. For example, in order to better implement

> Model View Controller, I really needed the ability to execute multiple

> fuseactions in the same HTTP request scope. So FuseQ does this. But 
> you can take a standard FB3 app and use the techspedition core file 
> with it and it will run just fine.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 4:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: FuseQ
> 
> 
> <FB3soapbox>
> so now we need stickers so we know if a module will work with windows 
> 95, or NT?? oh sorry FB3, FB3FEX, or FB3fuseQ???  I always thought the
> "rule" 
> was do not mess with the core if you plan on sharing code (free or 
> not)...if anyone can make their own core file then why do we have this
> new 
> community? why do we have these big debates? ANARCHY FOR ALL!!!
> </FB3soapbox>
> 
> <note>
> yes I know not all modules change the core just there so make a 
> point</note>
> 
> At 03:30 PM 5/8/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >ANYONE CAN MAKE THEIR OWN FUSEBOX FILES
> >
> >which is what they have done.  They have made files that are 
> >compliant
> >to the current spec, but extend it.  As long as you provide ALL of
the 
> >functionality provided by the current files,  you are in compliance 
> >with Fusebox 3.
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: craig girard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:34 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: FuseQ
> >
> >
> >Ok, just went to this site...................is techspedition making
> >their OWN fusebox files?
> >
> >whats with that?
> >
> >Craig
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "John Beynon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 11:34 AM
> >Subject: RE: FuseQ
> >
> >
> > > It's gonna be here
> > > http://www.techspedition.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=code.Main I 
> > > reckon,
> > >
> > > John.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rich Tretola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: 08 May 2002 14:43
> > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > Subject: FuseQ
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Anyone where I can get a copy of the new FuseQ stuff that John
> > > > presented at CF_North?
> > > >
> > > > Rich
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________________________________________
> > > > __
> > > > ___
> > > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET
> > > > delivered
> > > > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further
> > > > information visit http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/
> > > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________________
> > > __
> > > _
> > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET
> delivered
> > > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further
> information
> >visit
> > > http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> end
> ***********************************************************
> You can have it good
> You can have it cheep
> You can have it quick
> Pick two
> 
> - Sign in a studio I worked in once.
> ***********************************************************
> Michael "Maxx" Porter
> Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion 5.0 Certified Developer
> 
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================


Reply via email to