ditto, that was where I was trying to go with my soapbox post from before. For those who have not tried it I have a module for security at www.spime.com/fb3security by using modules others can choose what to add and what not to add, if everyone makes a new core file then we have to find out how to merge two "plug-ins" in to one core file as apposed to just adding modules. I thought FB3 was to help make plug and play items. perhaps new core files should be reserved for the steering community?
At 04:16 PM 5/9/2002 +0100, you wrote: >Exactly my thoughts.... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gallant, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 09 May 2002 16:11 > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: FuseQ > > > > > > Sounds like the best thing for Fusebox to me. Keep it fast, > > use what you need. That would also suppress peoples need to > > modify the existing core because people could just right > > modules to do what is needed. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nathan Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:54 AM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: FuseQ > > > > > > Yes! Yes! Yes! Modular, maybe even with an add-in API? > > > > -nate > > -------------------------- > > Nathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 515.288.3667 www.ipmvs.com > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Beynon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thu May 09 09:43:44 2002 > > Subject: RE: FuseQ > > > > Personally I was really excited about the security concepts > > Steve/Hal were coming up with a few months back that led to > > the arguments over Permissions and roles - and then it all went quiet. > > > > I think we've got to be careful about pumping the core files > > with stuff that just wouldn't get used. An interesting idea > > would be something along the lines of how Apache works, in > > that it's extensible. Being able to plug in modules into the > > core files would be something very neat...it's like the > > SESconverter, some use it, some don't have a need for it. > > Possibly having a config file for the fusebox which somehow > > incorporates these extensions into the core files and opens > > up additional variables would be very neat - > > DISCLAIMER: These are just thoughts I'm having whilst I'm > > typing, nothing more! > > > > Let's keep the core nice and trimmed...the way it should be :) > > > > John. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: craig girard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 09 May 2002 15:42 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: FuseQ > > > > > > > > > What about your security model? I'd love to see that in the > > > core files. > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "hal helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 7:04 PM > > > Subject: RE: FuseQ > > > > > > > > > > Actually, we have a spec so that anyone who writes to > > that spec can > > > > share their code. That doesn't mean that people can't make > > > changes or > > > > try innovations. I agree that a strict "don't ever change the core > > > > files" is easier to work with, but there are real needs for > > > > new/different functionality. For example, in order to > > > better implement > > > > Model View Controller, I really needed the ability to > > > execute multiple > > > > fuseactions in the same HTTP request scope. So FuseQ does > > this. But > > > > you can take a standard FB3 app and use the techspedition > > core file > > > > with it and it will run just fine. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Michael Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 4:42 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: FuseQ > > > > > > > > > > > > <FB3soapbox> > > > > so now we need stickers so we know if a module will work > > > with windows > > > > 95, or NT?? oh sorry FB3, FB3FEX, or FB3fuseQ??? I always > > > thought the > > > > "rule" > > > > was do not mess with the core if you plan on sharing code > > (free or > > > > not)...if anyone can make their own core file then why do > > > we have this > > > > new > > > > community? why do we have these big debates? ANARCHY FOR ALL!!! > > > > </FB3soapbox> > > > > > > > > <note> > > > > yes I know not all modules change the core just there so make a > > > > point</note> > > > > > > > > At 03:30 PM 5/8/2002 -0500, you wrote: > > > > >ANYONE CAN MAKE THEIR OWN FUSEBOX FILES > > > > > > > > > >which is what they have done. They have made files that are > > > > >compliant > > > > >to the current spec, but extend it. As long as you > > > provide ALL of the > > > > >functionality provided by the current files, you are in > > > compliance > > > > >with Fusebox 3. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > > >From: craig girard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:34 PM > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Subject: Re: FuseQ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Ok, just went to this site...................is > > > techspedition making > > > > >their OWN fusebox files? > > > > > > > > > >whats with that? > > > > > > > > > >Craig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > >From: "John Beynon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 11:34 AM > > > > >Subject: RE: FuseQ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's gonna be here > > > > > > http://www.techspedition.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=code.Main I > > > > > > reckon, > > > > > > > > > > > > John. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Rich Tretola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > Sent: 08 May 2002 14:43 > > > > > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > > > > Subject: FuseQ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone where I can get a copy of the new FuseQ > > stuff that John > > > > > > > presented at CF_North? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rich > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > __ > > > > > > > ___ > > > > > > > This message has been checked for all known viruses > > by UUNET > > > > > > > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For > > > > > > > further information visit > > > http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > __ > > > > > > _ > > > > > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET > > > > delivered > > > > > > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further > > > > information > > > > >visit > > > > > > http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > end > > > > *********************************************************** > > > > You can have it good > > > > You can have it cheep > > > > You can have it quick > > > > Pick two > > > > > > > > - Sign in a studio I worked in once. > > > > *********************************************************** > > > > Michael "Maxx" Porter > > > > Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion 5.0 Certified Developer > > > > > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET > > > delivered > > > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further > > > information visit http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET > > delivered > > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further > > information visit > > http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and > > affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or > > omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made > > in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue > > Shield of Florida, Inc. > > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET > > delivered > > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further > > information visit > > http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > > > >_____________________________________________________________________ >This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered >through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit >http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > end *********************************************************** You can have it good You can have it cheep You can have it quick Pick two - Sign in a studio I worked in once. *********************************************************** Michael "Maxx" Porter Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion 5.0 Certified Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
