Error handling, in my belief - is something that *SHOULD* be present in the core. We all need error handling, and to be able to do it cleanly via the core would I'm sure be an added bonus and one I'm sure that will be included into subsequent core releases, assuming it passes StanCom approval of course....
> -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 May 2002 17:22 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: FuseQ > > > This is all good and I totally agree. Some functionality, > however, simply can not be done with an add-on module to the > existing core files. Error catching, for example. > > > > perhaps new core files should be reserved for the > > steering community? > > The consortium we have just about completely formed now is > responsible for defining what the spec is, not necessarily > how it's implemented. We'll have more details later on this. > > -Erik > > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET > delivered > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further > information visit http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ > _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/ ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
