On 23 May 2002 at 19:27, Lee Borkman wrote:

Erm, Hal has been recommending an empty QuerySim-generated recordset for form 
reuse for, let's see, close to a year now.  Seems like a straw-man to say he does 
something else and then recommend the very technique he uses as a better 
alternative.

FWIW,
- Jeff


> 
> Hi Kay,
> 
> It's been a pretty vexed issue within Fusebox for a while. Many of us used Steve's 
> CF_ReuseForm tag,but it was always a little strange, although the concept was great. 
>Patrick 
> went with a set of CFPARAM statements, etc, etc.
> 
> I think that the best method around now is to write your form so that expects to 
>have values for 
> each field. Then for a form of "new" data, simply run CF_QuerySim to create an empty 
> recordset with the appropriate columns, etc, and you can use the same form fuse 
>without any 
> changes. I won't use the word "elegant" because that's something of a four-letter 
>word around 
> here, but it's quite pretty anyway.
> 
> I have also seen Hal use a SQL select with a false condition in the WHERE clause to 
>return an 
> empty recordset. That is pretty cute too. Anyway, I'd go with CF_QuerySim. That tag 
>has many 
> other uses, so why not get used to it? ;-)
> 
> Have fun,
> LeeBB
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
>     From: Kay Smoljak 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Over my last couple of projects, I have tried a couple of different ways
> to resuse forms (ie a single fuseaction for add or edit product, for
> example). I'm not really happy with any of them. Now I'm about to start
> a new large project, and I want it to be the bestest ever :) Does anyone
> have any *really elegant* methods for reusing forms that they would like
> to share?
> 
> Kay.
> 

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================



Reply via email to