..................... the presumable implication
> >would be a regressive surcharge on some consumer goods that
> >again puts the onus for today's socioeconomic problems on the
> >victims of class-ruled society--on workers who under capitalism
> >have little say in what is produced or under what conditions
> >production is accomplished.
> 
> No. Not surcharges on consumer goods, but price structiures which
> reflect the true lifecycle costs of products and FUELS.
> 
> 

the result would be extra taxes on consumer goods, surely, and that 
was the point: the process of taking from the lower earners
and gaining by the upper ones would go on.

Eva

...
 
> Caspar Davis
> 
> 
> 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to