The art of flip-flopping à la Natalia:
> | > But you haven't actually delved into psychology, and are rushing to
> | > bring in "help" by citing expert opinions
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> | Nonsense. I cited experts because you wanted to dismiss my position as
> | an exotic/layman view.
>
> $$$$$$ Not one expert was mentioned.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It's really pointless to discuss on this flip-flop basis. Anyway,
in citing the literature's criticism of Freud vs. cocaine, it is
not necessary to mention individual experts, especially when the
most relevant writings are in German -- for an interesting summary,
see http://www.sgipt.org/th_schul/pa/gesch/kokain.htm
> but leave that for when, if ever, you decide to pursue psychology at
> least at the level of dilettente$$$$$
I'd suggest you learn to spell dilettante before emitting further
dilettantish (or Freudian) psycho-babble -- and no, I have NOT "often
declared that psychology is psycho babble", but your school of psychology
is. From someone who even advised friends into death from drugs, and who
continued heavy smoking even after having his jaw removed due to cancer,
you really can't expect any sane position on drugs, illegal or not.
Consistently, you have no solution whatsoever to offer, only aggravation
(also literally). A waste of time.
Just saying no,
Chris
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
