Natalia K wrote: > My remark to you pertained to your inability to explain why you professed > that Freud's theories on the subconscious were not a significant > contribution to psychology.
I didn't doubt that they are a significant contribution to the wrong school(s) of psychology, but that they are on target for the important issues. > &&& I concede. I mis-spelled a word. At least I know the meaning of it. It was a projection anyway. > &&& You have often declared that psychology is psycho-babble. The last > time was when you used it to debunk the "all-or-none" syndrome. Nonsense -- you misattributed the "all-or-none" syndrome. > > From someone who even advised friends into death from drugs, and who > > continued heavy smoking even after having his jaw removed due to cancer, > > you really can't expect any sane position on drugs, illegal or not. > > &&& Perhaps if you rewrote the above it would not be up to interpretation. > Are you saying that it is unlikely to expect a sane position from you on > drugs because you partook in them to your detriment, and advised to the > detriment of others their use of them? Or are you talking about another > friend? &&&&& Ha, ha. Obviously I was talking about Freud, but your drug-inspired attention span seems to be too short to have noticed this from the context. > Consistently, you have no solution whatsoever to offer, only aggravation > (also literally). A waste of time. > > &&&&&&You are the one who is supposed to have answers you haven't yet > shared.Nor do you ever respond to my very relevant questions. You should come up with a better concept if you think that mine is bad. I did respond to your questions but you are unable or unwilling to listen. And your claim to be "addressing the root cause of violence/depression/ oppression" is preposterous because you have no idea of the basic issues, with assertions like (earlier): >>> People were violent/depressed/oppressed through the bygone ages of >>> healthier soil and water, healthier diets Actually, in the "bygone ages", malnutrition was immense. In contrast, our modern era would provide a unique opportunity for optimum nutrition, but instead the junkfood junta is serving worse food than ever. Your fundamental misunderstanding of this issue is emblematic of the counterproductiveness of your concept. And your umpteenth strawman about the CIA's "war on drugs" doesn't improve your point at all. Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword "igve". _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
