2012 will be ten cycles of 52 years exactly sing 1492.    What do we call
those ten cycles?    Heaven or Hell?   Actually hell is supposed to be 13
cycles.  So we have three left over.   Three the sacred number for.....who?
Well we have the three Elder Fires that are representative of the Great
Mystery.     Or maybe something was going on  here and in Europe in 1336.
Anyone have any ideas?     Mike Hollinshead tells me there is a similar wave
pattern around economics.    Anyone know anything about that?      We say
that it could be the beginning of the 9 heavens but we would have to be up
to it.:>))    I don't know, I'm doing housework and I'm tired.    500 seems
like a lot to contemplate.   I'm just teaching my classes and trying to give
away all of this stuff that I have accumulated over 52 years of teaching.
Oops!    52 again.   Am I sixty seven or sixty eight?

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Gurstein
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 4:28 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: [Futurework] FW: The Next 500 Years

 

And this one seems to tie it all together--Ray's speaking from and with his
ancestors, Mike's digressions about quantum physics, and my positioning for
something anchored in the urban flow...

 

M

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Sid Shniad
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 11:47 AM
Subject: The Next 500 Years

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/08/26


CommonDreams.org <http://www.commondreams.org/>
August 26, 2010 


The Next 500 Years


by Robert C. Koehler

The participants in this unique dialogue may have been doing no less than
opening the window on the next 500 years.

As scary and stupefying as our world sometimes seems, we are at a place of
enormous potential right now -- a transition point of unprecedented
understanding among cultures and peoples and worldviews. Pushing that
understanding, creating, in the words of the late physicist David Bohm, a
milieu of "participatory consciousness" among radically diverse thinkers, is
the idea behind the Language of Spirit Conference, sponsored by the SEED
Graduate Institute, which has been held in Albuquerque every year since
1999.

Last week I attended the 12th annual Language of Spirit Conference, which
brought together Western scientists and scholars and Native North American
and Australian scientists, philosophers and storytellers, not to argue, but
to grope for commonality at the far reaches of their belief systems. The
original dialogues, convened by Bohm and Leroy Little Bear (former director
of Native Studies at Harvard) in Kalamazoo, Mich., in 1992, came about
because Little Bear, who was well-versed in the developments of quantum
physics, realized that Western science had reached the end of linear thought
and finally got it: The universe is a living, conscious, interconnected
organism. 

This is how the world's indigenous people see things. They always have.
Reverently tied to place, they have been the natural world's caretakers for
thousands of years. They are of the world, living not just sustainably but
in intimate relationship with their sacred piece of Planet Earth.

"We are a people who never made singing or dancing unrespected ways of
knowing," said Pat McCabe, a Navajo writer and scholar who also goes by the
name Woman Stands Shining. "All of the five-fingered ways of knowing
remained open to us."

And now . . . now . . . 500 years after Western conquistadors subdued and
divided the planet, devastating indigenous people on every continent and,
while they were at it, pushing the natural world to the brink of
eco-collapse, we are turning -- some of us -- to the wisdom of connectedness
that has been ours for the asking all along.

This isn't easy or simple. Our disconnect from one another, from ourselves
and from the natural world is embedded in the Western languages, which break
the world into millions of discrete, manipulable pieces, called nouns ("My
name is Matthew. I'm a nounaholic," cried linguist Matthew Bronson).
Westerners control reality through language, but they don't evoke it.
Indigenous languages are, as I am slowly coming to understand them,
verb-based, intrinsically linking speaker and object in a flow of motion
that cannot be linguistically sliced and diced.

Just as I began writing this column, the New Yorker arrived in the mail. On
the cover of the Aug. 30 issue is a drawing of a middle-aged white guy
sitting on a beach chair at the edge of the ocean, smugly pointing a TV
remote at it -- perfectly illustrating the disconnected, control-fixated
Westerner the Language of Spirit Conference was addressing . . . the one who
has done so much harm.

With eerie synchronicity, the water on the New Yorker cover flows back to
the dialogue. Speaking about the BP oil spill, SEED founder Glenn Aparicio
Parry noted in amazement, "The mainstream world believes that water is dead
-- yet we're 70 percent water."

"The assumption of the laws (of science)," said biophysicist Beverly Rubik,
"is that we're a non-living universe. We ought to start over. We have a
science that starts with deadness. It's time to revision science -- in a
living universe."

These words begin to get at the vibration of the conference -- this exercise
in participatory consciousness -- which struck at the core of something
vital. The ostensible subject of the 12th Language of Spirit dialogue was
time. The speakers dismantled linear time, the kind that moves in a straight
line and pulls us along on its track. (In the U.S., time wasn't standardized
till 1886, when the railroads demanded it.) Nonlinear time -- the
timelessness of dreaming, reverence, prayer and awe -- filled the room, and
I could feel the living universe pulse. It pulsed with love.

"The eagle is more valuable to you alive" than as merely a source of
feathers, said Chickasaw poet Linda Hogan. "The sacred thing is the life
force."

It also pulsed with anger. Writer M.J. Zimmerman, speaking about SEED
spiritual mentor Leon Secatero, who died in 2008, said: "Grandfather Leon
always talked about getting ready for the next 500 years. We're in a
transition point. The anger of colonization should not be brought into the
next 500 years. 

"Hurt people hurt people," she added. "Europeans have moved into every part
of this planet and hurt people." She offered the plea that we in the
disconnected West find our own roots, dig "way back into our own traumatic
history" and begin to heal our brokenness.

And for the first time in my life I found myself groping in the darkness of
my own past, beyond a few generations of known ancestors and beyond my
identity as an American, toward an ancient tribal commonality that has
fallen out of history, and I felt a slow give in the assumptions of my life.

"Everyone is indigenous," said Jill Milroy, dean of the School of Indigenous
Studies at the University of Western Australia. Perhaps knowing this is the
first step in envisioning the next 500 years.

C 2010 Tribune Media Services, Inc.

Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist and nationally
syndicated writer. You can respond to this column at [email protected] or
visit his Web site at commonwonders.com <http://commonwonders.com/> .)

 

 


!DSPAM:2676,4c795db7177553508518627! 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to