"Mike Hollinshead tells me there is a similar wave pattern around
economics.    Anyone know anything about that?"

Kondratieff waves. I wrote a paper on that back in 1979. I guess you could
say I know something about it.


On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Ray Harrell <[email protected]> wrote:

>  2012 will be ten cycles of 52 years exactly sing 1492.    What do we call
> those ten cycles?    Heaven or Hell?   Actually hell is supposed to be 13
> cycles.  So we have three left over.   Three the sacred number
> for……………who?     Well we have the three Elder Fires that are representative
> of the Great Mystery.     Or maybe something was going on  here and in
> Europe in 1336.    Anyone have any ideas?     Mike Hollinshead tells me
> there is a similar wave pattern around economics.    Anyone know anything
> about that?      We say that it could be the beginning of the 9 heavens but
> we would have to be up to it.:>))    I don’t know, I’m doing housework and
> I’m tired.    500 seems like a lot to contemplate.   I’m just teaching my
> classes and trying to give away all of this stuff that I have accumulated
> over 52 years of teaching.   Oops!    52 again.   Am I sixty seven or sixty
> eight?
>
>
>
> REH
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Michael Gurstein
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 28, 2010 4:28 PM
> *To:* 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
> *Subject:* [Futurework] FW: The Next 500 Years
>
>
>
> And this one seems to tie it all together--Ray's speaking from and with his
> ancestors, Mike's digressions about quantum physics, and my positioning for
> something anchored in the urban flow...
>
>
>
> M
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
> Of *Sid Shniad
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 28, 2010 11:47 AM
> *Subject:* The Next 500 Years
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/08/26
>
>
> CommonDreams.org <http://www.commondreams.org/>
> August 26, 2010
> The Next 500 Years
>
> by Robert C. Koehler
>
> The participants in this unique dialogue may have been doing no less than
> opening the window on the next 500 years.
>
> As scary and stupefying as our world sometimes seems, we are at a place of
> enormous potential right now -- a transition point of unprecedented
> understanding among cultures and peoples and worldviews. Pushing that
> understanding, creating, in the words of the late physicist David Bohm, a
> milieu of "participatory consciousness" among radically diverse thinkers, is
> the idea behind the Language of Spirit Conference, sponsored by the SEED
> Graduate Institute, which has been held in Albuquerque every year since
> 1999.
>
> Last week I attended the 12th annual Language of Spirit Conference, which
> brought together Western scientists and scholars and Native North American
> and Australian scientists, philosophers and storytellers, not to argue, but
> to grope for commonality at the far reaches of their belief systems. The
> original dialogues, convened by Bohm and Leroy Little Bear (former director
> of Native Studies at Harvard) in Kalamazoo, Mich., in 1992, came about
> because Little Bear, who was well-versed in the developments of quantum
> physics, realized that Western science had reached the end of linear thought
> and finally got it: The universe is a living, conscious, interconnected
> organism.
>
> This is how the world's indigenous people see things. They always have.
> Reverently tied to place, they have been the natural world's caretakers for
> thousands of years. They are *of* the world, living not just sustainably
> but in intimate relationship with their sacred piece of Planet Earth.
>
> "We are a people who never made singing or dancing unrespected ways of
> knowing," said Pat McCabe, a Navajo writer and scholar who also goes by the
> name Woman Stands Shining. "All of the five-fingered ways of knowing
> remained open to us."
>
> And now . . . now . . . 500 years after Western conquistadors subdued and
> divided the planet, devastating indigenous people on every continent and,
> while they were at it, pushing the natural world to the brink of
> eco-collapse, we are turning -- some of us -- to the wisdom of connectedness
> that has been ours for the asking all along.
>
> This isn't easy or simple. Our disconnect from one another, from ourselves
> and from the natural world is embedded in the Western languages, which break
> the world into millions of discrete, manipulable pieces, called nouns ("My
> name is Matthew. I'm a nounaholic," cried linguist Matthew Bronson).
> Westerners control reality through language, but they don't evoke it.
> Indigenous languages are, as I am slowly coming to understand them,
> verb-based, intrinsically linking speaker and object in a flow of motion
> that cannot be linguistically sliced and diced.
>
> Just as I began writing this column, the New Yorker arrived in the mail. On
> the cover of the Aug. 30 issue is a drawing of a middle-aged white guy
> sitting on a beach chair at the edge of the ocean, smugly pointing a TV
> remote at it -- perfectly illustrating the disconnected, control-fixated
> Westerner the Language of Spirit Conference was addressing . . . the one who
> has done so much harm.
>
> With eerie synchronicity, the water on the New Yorker cover flows back to
> the dialogue. Speaking about the BP oil spill, SEED founder Glenn Aparicio
> Parry noted in amazement, "The mainstream world believes that water is dead
> -- yet we're 70 percent water."
>
> "The assumption of the laws (of science)," said biophysicist Beverly Rubik,
> "is that we're a non-living universe. We ought to start over. We have a
> science that starts with deadness. It's time to revision science -- in a
> living universe."
>
> These words begin to get at the vibration of the conference -- this
> exercise in participatory consciousness -- which struck at the core of
> something vital. The ostensible subject of the 12th Language of Spirit
> dialogue was time. The speakers dismantled linear time, the kind that moves
> in a straight line and pulls us along on its track. (In the U.S., time
> wasn't standardized till 1886, when the railroads demanded it.) Nonlinear
> time -- the timelessness of dreaming, reverence, prayer and awe -- filled
> the room, and I could feel the living universe pulse. It pulsed with love.
>
> "The eagle is more valuable to you alive" than as merely a source of
> feathers, said Chickasaw poet Linda Hogan. "The sacred thing is the life
> force."
>
> It also pulsed with anger. Writer M.J. Zimmerman, speaking about SEED
> spiritual mentor Leon Secatero, who died in 2008, said: "Grandfather Leon
> always talked about getting ready for the next 500 years. We're in a
> transition point. The anger of colonization should not be brought into the
> next 500 years.
>
> "Hurt people hurt people," she added. "Europeans have moved into every part
> of this planet and hurt people." She offered the plea that we in the
> disconnected West find our own roots, dig "way back into our own traumatic
> history" and begin to heal our brokenness.
>
> And for the first time in my life I found myself groping in the darkness of
> my own past, beyond a few generations of known ancestors and beyond my
> identity as an American, toward an ancient tribal commonality that has
> fallen out of history, and I felt a slow give in the assumptions of my life.
>
> "Everyone is indigenous," said Jill Milroy, dean of the School of
> Indigenous Studies at the University of Western Australia. Perhaps knowing
> this is the first step in envisioning the next 500 years.
>
> © 2010 Tribune Media Services, Inc.
>
> *Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist and
> nationally syndicated writer. You can respond to this column at
> [email protected] or visit his Web site at commonwonders.com.)*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> !DSPAM:2676,4c795db7177553508518627!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
>


-- 
Sandwichman
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to