When you look up the root meaning of jobs in etymology, it relates to
temporary work.    "On the job" is from 1882 the second industrial
revolution.   

 

The whole concept of work, jobs and the factory were evolving towards scale
and simpler skills.     The culmination was Henry Ford's "meditation."
The Assembly Line.    The idea of apprentice, journeyman and master that is
a part of the great guilds and art works like Die Schoene Muellerin is not
to be found in the evolution of jobs.     So  modern "jobs" meant a dumbing
down for the purpose of removing the necessity for complicated skills and
having lower pay.  "productivity".      For example the Steinway piano
company was founded on individual craftsmanship and mastery.   At one point
they demanded that the piano craftsmen write everything down for a manual so
that the company could own and control it.    A Piano technician friend of
mine had a  father who was one of those craftsmen.    He told me that the
new workers were not as good and that the craftsmen refused to write
everything down.     

 

Thus began the problem with intellectual capital in complex products that
haunts us still in silicon valley down to the present.     Scale education
cannot be face to face.     Scale education is now the rule with the
exception of the Arts where the old skills are too complicated even for
choirs.     The Arts and scientific research  requires face to face tutoring
and careful management of the order of information with a guarantee of
mastery before performance can be assured.  (Is anyone else here addicted to
"House"? )      The issue of complexity is an ongoing problem for economics
which must guarantee that time lowers all complexity in order to create and
economy of scale.    Obviously all of those scans for diagnosis by House and
company would be hopelessly expensive for scale on medical costs.     The
Arts,  NASA and Medical diagnosis  have proven the lie to the theory and
therefore are incapable of productivity and continued payment to the
practitioners commensurate with their skill level.   It challenges the whole
idea of work in the Western model. 

 

How long before someone catches on?   :>))   "Please brer fox don't throw me
in that briar patch!"

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nadia McLaren
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:57 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Humanities?

 

This reminded me of another good video on the future of education,
particularly its current industrialized forms.  

 

Changing Education Paradigms

Sir Ken Robinson

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U

 

Offers few answers but very good questions - and some dazzling visual
capture.  Nadia

 

> Just thought this video might be another bellwether re: the devastation

> of the educational system as it pertains to the future of work. Let's

> keep the people dumb, cold and crass. What better soldiers could you ask

> for.

> 

> 

> 

> http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/7451115/

> 

> 

> Darryl

> _______________________________________________

> Futurework mailing list

> [email protected]

> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

 

  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to