At 22:37 09/01/2011 -0800, Darryl wrote:
Unless the male's deviant (vanity centric, conceited, selfish) ego requires the power over feeling of taking the most convenient beautiful, younger woman very often against her will (or desire). NOTE: these problems move through both sexes (just work the opposites through your mind).

Darryl

Yes, it can be nasty when power obtrudes. This is why rape is so abhorrent (but all too frequent unfortunately). And, yes, it can work the other way round, too. Any beautiful girl with a modicum of intelligence, who plays her social cards carefully, and who has a desire to, can make her way into almost every level of male society. If that's not power, I don't know what is! Another thing I've noticed throughout life is that although violent husbands can do a great deal of damage to both wives and children, violent mothers develop more deeply disturbed children with longer lasting problems. As far as I know this has never been scientifically investigated, though it probably will be one day. On the other hand, I've also noticed that very successful children (particularly males) tend to come from families where the wife wore the trousers. Also, outstandingly gifted and successful females seem to come from families with outstanding fathers.

Keith

On 1/9/2011 9:52 PM, Sandwichman wrote:
Except the DSM definition went much farther than ordinary human frailty. Incidentally, Keith, the "youngest and most [conventionally] beautiful woman" is not necessarily the most gratifying -- either long term or immediately.

On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Keith Hudson <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: I don't think that narcissism (or egotism, vanity, conceit, selfishness) are socially deviant. They are part and parcel of human nature. We may be social mammals but we are also individuals underneath. A male, given the opportunity will have sex with the youngest and most beautiful woman he can find. A woman, looking for a parental partner will choose the most economically secure man she can conveniently find. Neither gives a great deal of thought to the longer tomorrow, only to their immediate needs. Narcissism , egotism, vanity, conceit, selfishness, among other "sins" were abstractions used as control devices by male religion organizers, not to mention the very real sufferings they've imposed on others throughout history.
Keith


At 17:31 09/01/2011 -0800, Mike Gurstein wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of marc garrett
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 2:36 PM
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
Subject: [NetBehaviour] Narcissism normalised.

Narcissism normalised.
"Recently a NYTimes (<http://is.gd/i3Cj9>http://is.gd/i3Cj9) article announced that
narcissism is being deleted from the tomb for psychiatric disorders.
Narcissism will not appear in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (due out in 2013, and known as
DSM-5). What happens when what was once morally objectionable behaviour
( egotism, vanity, conceit, selfishness) is no longer a 'legitimate'
social deviance? Is narcissism now so deeply embedded in the collective
psyche that it is now 'normal'? Is this the ultimate end of the
neo-liberal exhalation of the individual, celebrity culture, a century's
worth of advertising and the corporatisation of everyday life?"
<http://ecolabs.posterous.com/narcissism-normalized>http://ecolabs.posterous.com/narcissism-normalized
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
Keith Hudson, Saltford, England <http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2011/01/>http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2011/01/

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework




--
Sandwichman




_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2011/01/
   
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to