Just to be absolutely unambiguous, I'm as cynical as anyone about the
sincerity of the greenwashing industry -- "if you can fake sincerity,
you've got it made". My stuck-in-the-head quote these days is Orwell's "All
left-wing parties in the highly industrialized countries are at bottom a
sham, because they make it their business to fight against something which
they do not really wish to destroy." But it doesn't follow that all
right-wing parties are therefore NOT a sham.

I think one of the functions of schadenfreude is to reward and reinforce
cognitive dissonance. The ironic chuckle of "Being green then and now" is
at bottom a schadenfreude experience, which, in true cognitive dissonance
style, "absolves" the chuckler of his or her peccadilloes.

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Tom Walker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Would you have in mind something along the lines of the aptly-named
> "Titanic Eco-Spa"? Green buildings, spring water and towels and a "spa
> traveler award". I kid you not.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Arthur Cordell <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Would also add to the cute message that oh so many greenies are recycling
>> this and that and then without a thought jump on a jet to go off to this
>> or
>> that conference or vacation spot without a thought as to what these and a
>> host of other personal activities are doing that run counter to the
>> religion
>> of being green.
>>
>> arthur
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 10:49 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [Futurework] Re: Being Green Then and Now
>>
>>
>> Tom Walker wrote:
>>
>> > Cute but false and misleading.
>> > [snip]
>> > "Cute" bullshit is still bullshit.
>>
>> Well, yeah.  But not any greater or more tedious bullshit than many of the
>> putatively "green" odds & sods that we're expected (or forced) to embrace
>> today, many of which (IMHO) are ways of externalizing some large entity's
>> cost onto the consumer or create a profit ex novo.
>>
>> Yes, the vast volumes of toxics and particulates fired up smokestacks,
>> down
>> drains and off tailings dumps before regulation outweigh, in global
>> effect,
>> plastic bags or gas lawn mowers.  The point of the "cute" piece was to
>> ridicule self-righteous Greenness among those who adopt and evangelize the
>> Green Consumer Catechism without critical thought or meaningful knowledge.
>>
>> Or so I understood it.
>>
>>
>> - Mike
>>
>> --
>> Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~.
>>                                                           /V\
>> [email protected]                                     /( )\
>> http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/                        ^^-^^
>> _______________________________________________
>> Futurework mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Futurework mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
>



-- 
Cheers,

Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to