Lawry, I'd suspect there are several causes of what we view as pychopathy.  
Dysfunctional child-rearing would be one.  However doctrinaire education and 
perpetual bombardment by propaganda would likely be another, when one thinks of 
how the Germans behaved toward Jews before and during WWII.  Another cause, and 
a very important one I believe, depends on where and how you grew up.  I'm 
halfway through an very gloomy book by Chris Hedges (words) and Joe Sacco 
(illustrative drawings) called "Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt".  The 
parts I've read so far deal with the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation and the 
decline of Camden, New Jersey, as an industrial town.  There are very few jobs 
to be had in both of those places.  Young people, to get any money, form gangs 
and sell drugs or booze, and woe betide anyone who gets in their way.

However, this is not to say that there isn't a type of psychopathy that is 
based on some genetic flaw in a person's mind.  Under certain circumstances, 
and no matter how well or badly that person was raised, that flaw would simply 
go "click" and the person would be induced to do something horrible and perhaps 
be happy doing it.

Ed

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: de Bivort Lawrence 
  To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION 
  Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 5:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] 'Dark Knight Rises' shooting: Three heroes died 
inAurora taking bullets for their girlfriends - NY Daily News


  Sorry for all the hurried typos....corrections here:


  On the first question, all my research into the psycho-cognitive profiles of 
people suggests that there is no special identifier for social psychopaths. 
That is, the profiles of "normal" people and social psycho-paths (as defined by 
state- and non-state terrorists) are indistinguishably similar. Social 
psychopaths can only, it seems, be recognized by their behaviors, which is 
often too late.


  If this is correct, then I would suggest that the only way to do something to 
diminish these kinds of massacres (or their counterparts in the military 
financial industry) is to raise kids properly to begin with. I believe that 
much of today's approaches to child-rearing are profoundly dysfunctional, and 
am wondering if they are dysfunctional to the point where they actually produce 
the occasional unself-controlled social psychopath?




  On Jul 23, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Ed Weick wrote:


    You never really know, do you, not even if you've know a person for a long 
time.  Even then you can't be certain.  Take the Russell Williams case.  A very 
senior military officer, a base commander, a very good pilot who flew the Prime 
Minister's plane, and apparently, socially, not a bad guy at all.  But then, at 
night, he'd sneak out and collect panties, killing two women in the process.  
Makes you want to watch everybody and keep your windows locked.

    And as far as men protecting women goes, it may stem from something buried 
very deeply in the human genome: women may be more important to the continuity 
of the human race than men.

    Ed

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Keith Hudson 
      To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION ; D & N 
      Cc: [email protected] 
      Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 11:57 AM
      Subject: Re: [Futurework] 'Dark Knight Rises' shooting: Three heroes died 
in Aurora taking bullets for their girlfriends - NY Daily News


      At 15:16 23/07/2012, Darryl wrote:

        Add extreme abuse to those life histories as well.

      True, but what is particularly interesting (that is, disturbing) is that, 
over the years, I've noticed that, from what one gains from newspaper accounts, 
many of these mass/serial murderers superficially appear to have been quite 
normal to those around them. They may be judged retroactively by people who 
knew them in everyday life to have been a little lacking in the normal range of 
warm human behaviours but nothing exceptional. Their parents, too, don't seem 
to be out of the ordinary. On the other hand, many (if not all) young men who 
are clearly sociopathic have usually acted violently all through their school 
years and turn out to have had abusive or deeply neglectful parents.

      I first became interested what appear to be a Holmes/Breivick type of 
non-sociopathic killer because I knew one in my schooldays (when I was 16). The 
rest of my class and I were shocked one morning to hear that one of our number 
had killed two young nurses with a hammer and almost strangled an old lady he 
was trying to rape. Now, we had known him for five years. We thought he was a 
little eccentric because he was mad about buses and collected their numbers in 
a little book, but otherwise quite normal. However, we learned later that not 
only was his bedroom walls covered in photos of buses but also that hundreds of 
bras and other ladies' underwear were stuffed into drawers and every other 
available niche. His parents weren't abusive but his bedroom should have rung 
warning bells. He (and they, probably) badly needed some sort of psychiatric 
attention. And then what could or should have been done? 

      Keith




        On 22/07/2012 9:56 PM, Keith Hudson wrote:

          Arthur,

          My comment is that I strongly doubt the literal accuracy of this news 
account. Men are more inclined to be heroic in emergencies because males, 
intrinsically, are more risk-taking than females. For example, in the Zeebrugge 
ferry disaster in 1987 (in which 193 passengers and crew died), I remember 
reading at the time that one young man, in dangerous circumstances, helped many 
passengers to escape from being trapped below. But the total weight of evidence 
from many ship disasters over the years says that men take to the lifeboats 
disproportionately to women and children. There were examples of this, I 
believe, during the Ttitanic sinking.

          All stories of tragedies tend to get enhanced from the word go. I can 
well imagine three young men throwing their arms around their girl friends and 
then trying to flee together or take cover. But if three of the six were to die 
then it's only 8:1 against three men rather than girls being hit.

          Incidentally, I'm glad that the police didn't kill Holmes at Aurora. 
As with Breivik's massacres a year ago in Norway, and his arrest, we need to 
know a great deal more about the early life stories of these men (usually 
social isolates) to identify other potential misfits at as young an age as 
possible in order to hopefully deflect their development.

          Keith

          At 04:26 23/07/2012, you wrote:

            Way off topic but sort of intriguing.

            Arthur


            To: ' [email protected]'
            Subject: FW: 'Dark Knight Rises' shooting: Three heroes died in 
Aurora
            taking bullets for their girlfriends - NY Daily News

            Interesting.  The response of the male seems to be to protect.  
Instinctive?
            Who knows.  Maybe Keith has an answer or would care to comment.

            Arthur
            'Dark Knight Rises' shooting: Three heroes died in Aurora taking 
bullets for
            their girlfriends In final acts of valor, Jon Blunk, Matt McQuinn 
and Alex
            Teves used their bodies to shield their girlfriends as accused 
madman James
            Holmes turned the Aurora cineplex into a shooting gallery.

            Read more:
            
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/aurora-shooting-died-bullets-sweeti 
            es-article-1.1119395#ixzz21Oy21I65

            http://tinyurl.com/c9sj52m
            
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/aurora-shooting-died-bullets-sweeti 
            es-article-1.1119395
            Sent from my iPad

        https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
      Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com
        




--------------------------------------------------------------------------



      _______________________________________________
      Futurework mailing list
      [email protected]
      https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

    _______________________________________________
    Futurework mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Futurework mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to