>BRAD ALSO SAID: >Why don't we start consistently supporting human dignity which > can only exist in a peer environment, and give up all forms of > art with leaders and followers (and impersonal > audiences) as outgrown forms of life, even > if they have their nostalgic appeal to some of us.
One other point. Complexity is in the mind of those who can't do. If you know how to do it then it isn't complex. Until you do know how to do it you have to follow those who do know how to do it. So the issue of peer doesn't have to do with doing away with leaders but in building an inner motivation for mastery in the minds of all workers. That would do away with the economic concept of "scale" which is built upon a collective dumbness and drudgery of work as a worthy goal in order to allow the person to get their fulfillment from breeding children and planting flowers outside of a city on their little plot of land. You see Brad, if you raise everyone's level of peerage and mastery then you would have to do away with what 99% of this list calls the Future of Work! It is the kind of thought that says that planting rivets on a factory floor is more important than learning the intricacies of Chromatic Harmony. It depends upon what kind of a brain you need for your happiness, or is that "utility?" Or maybe whether your hair is Ivy or Prairie Grass? REH
