Clinton would not have lied under oath had the
rightwingers not worked very hard to set up
a situation in which he would be asked questions
which persons in our sexually-hypocritical country
can't safely answer straight without having to to fear
"consequences". They screwed Clinton -- in a Starr
chamber proceeding.
The things Clinton lied about had nothing to do with
the governance of the republic. THE QUESTIONS SHOULD NEVER
HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO BE ASKED. And, if they could be
asked, then Clinton should have been able to
say something like: "Sure I had sex with that woman.
I also smoked pot in undergraduate school, and
I pick my nose, too. If you don't like it,
then don't go looking for it. It's a free
country, and people have the right to
lead their personal lives without being
harrassed by self-appointed improvers of
the country's morals."
And that should have been the end of it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Clinton lied under oath. For the chief law enforcement officer of the
> nation this sets a bad example. You can't run a nation on a wink and a nod.
>
> It was not about sex.
[snip]
You're right. It was about entrapment. It was about self-righteous
extralegal morals enforcement. It's about a lot of very
ugly things.
But, giving credit where credit is due, Clinton
gave them material to do him in with. He should have
jerked off in the Executive washroom instead of getting
himself serviced by propinquitous bimbos. He
should have taken a vow of "chastity" as long as he as in
office, so as to not give the republicans the "dirt"
to go after him with.
\brad mccormick
--
Let your light so shine before men,
that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16)
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21)
<![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/
