I agree and I am a left winger who wants my revenge. I don't like people who are pro-growth built on the backs of everyone else but themselves. Unlike Keith I haven't grown more conservative but I have grown more angry, like a friend of mine who was dieing from Leukemia and had to listen to these folks who believed they would live forever and "deserved to" while they stuck it to the people who worked for them and bought their products. Some kind of disconnect in their brains. Same for the people who built the socialist alternative to communism in Europe and then came home and became Neo-conservatives and vetoed every progressive program in the country as too expensive.
Your resident Crank Ray Evans Harrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brad McCormick, Ed.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 5:43 PM Subject: Re: An Uncertain Presidency An Uncertain Time (was an Uncertain Britain) > Clinton would not have lied under oath had the > rightwingers not worked very hard to set up > a situation in which he would be asked questions > which persons in our sexually-hypocritical country > can't safely answer straight without having to to fear > "consequences". They screwed Clinton -- in a Starr > chamber proceeding. > > The things Clinton lied about had nothing to do with > the governance of the republic. THE QUESTIONS SHOULD NEVER > HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO BE ASKED. And, if they could be > asked, then Clinton should have been able to > say something like: "Sure I had sex with that woman. > I also smoked pot in undergraduate school, and > I pick my nose, too. If you don't like it, > then don't go looking for it. It's a free > country, and people have the right to > lead their personal lives without being > harrassed by self-appointed improvers of > the country's morals." > And that should have been the end of it. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Clinton lied under oath. For the chief law enforcement officer of the > > nation this sets a bad example. You can't run a nation on a wink and a nod. > > > > It was not about sex. > [snip] > > You're right. It was about entrapment. It was about self-righteous > extralegal morals enforcement. It's about a lot of very > ugly things. > > But, giving credit where credit is due, Clinton > gave them material to do him in with. He should have > jerked off in the Executive washroom instead of getting > himself serviced by propinquitous bimbos. He > should have taken a vow of "chastity" as long as he as in > office, so as to not give the republicans the "dirt" > to go after him with. > > \brad mccormick > > -- > Let your light so shine before men, > that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16) > > Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21) > > <![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/
