Greetings, Keith,

I've used slo-mo video before and with good equipment it is possible to see
a lot of 'microbehaviors' that go otherwise unperceived.  Oddly, also, I
tried speeding up the tapes and could then too see patterns that I had
missed at regular speeds. We had one striking application of this, coaching
a local, rising politician to discard of a habit that apparently irritated
viewers; his ratings went up substantially after the coaching, though
nothing else had changed. Not conclusive or controlled enough to be
determinative, but it was pretty suggestive that a microbehavioral habit had
a significant (and in this case negative) impact.

Keep up the good observation.  I hope some day we can meet up and explore
this further.

Best regards,
Lawry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Hudson
> Sent: Fri, March 21, 2003 9:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Futurework] Perle's body language, etc
>
>
> Hi Lawry,
>
> I'm sorry, I can't add anything more to what I observed -- except perhaps
> that not only were his verbal responses delayed but also the smiles and
> mock grimaces that he elected to make from time to time. Otherwise, the
> stillness of his face and hands was not in any way unusual for politicians
> and people in his position who are used to controlling themselves
> carefully
> when being interviewed. However, the delays in his responses -- and the
> constancy of those pauses, whatever the difficulty of the question -- were
> those of a master, in my opinion. As said before, I interpret this
> behaviour as a consequence of long-time experience in considering every
> question carefully, even the apparently innocent ones. In short, I thought
> Perele's performance was that of a superbly trained diplomat, or senior
> mandarin, unlike that of, say, Rumsfeld whose body language is extremely
> labile and thus, quite readable.
>
> I can't help you with any other observations -- I was concentrating mainly
> on what Perle was saying. I can't remember precisely what happened when he
> was obviously momentarily thrown by a couple of cleverly-phrased questions
> from the ex-ambassador and Dimbleby himself. It would be
> fascinating to see
> a slow-motion replay of his demeanour during those two brief episodes. I
> suspect his facial muscles went haywire for a few microseconds!
>
> Keith
>
>
> At 07:23 21/03/03 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hi, Keith,
> >
> >Sorry for the delay in getting back: things have been busy.
> >
> >Many thanks for the report on Perle's body language. Very
> interesting. Most
> >people don't notice things as precisely or acutely, so
> appreciate the info
> >and the effort you put into reporting them.
> >
> >Did you notice anything about eye movements, by any chance, and
> if so, can
> >you associated a pattern of eye movements with a pattern of
> subject matter
> >being discussed? I would be very interested in any other
> observations that
> >you can recall: muscle tone changes, skin color changes, head
> tilts, depth
> >and pace of breathing, tone, volume, timbre of the voice, unusual word
> >choice, etc.
> >
> >The two instances of what I would call incongruencies that you
> report may or
> >may not be significant; the incongruence can be genuine, but the
> substantive
> >significance of an incongruence must be is unclear until the subject's
> >patterns are better known.
> >
> >I don't think that any of this (or intelligence either, though I am less
> >knowledgeable about that) is genetic, or at least if it is in any degree,
> >the reliability of the association would be much too low and
> low-resolution
> >to be useful in understanding or reading an individual.  The kinds of
> >patterns that I am looking for seem to cut across cultures and
> ethnicities,
> >with vastly more variation among members of a group than between groups.
> >Over the years I have come to discount generalizations about
> groups, and to
> >pay attention to individuals to understand (those) individuals.
> Of course,
> >that increases the cognitive and research burden immensely. Did
> you ever see
> >the book, Body Language? It tried to suggest, for example, that some
> >postures meant certain things about people, universally. Many
> people bought
> >into the notion both because it suggested ways of understanding
> people and
> >because it was easy. But, instead, it was misleading.
> >
> >We can now model the cognitive processes in individuals, but it remains a
> >person-by-person undertaking, given the levels of precision we need.
> >
> >Again, many thanks, and I hope you might be able to add more, along the
> >lines I ask, above.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Lawry
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ------------
>
> Keith Hudson, General Editor, Handlo Music, http://www.handlo.com
> 6 Upper Camden Place, Bath BA1 5HX, England
> Tel: +44 1225 312622;  Fax: +44 1225 447727; mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ________________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to