Of course if a dissatisfied customer sues McDonald then they are a piker and
a "take advantager uhver"   and there aught to be a tort law to do away with
such abuses by the consumers.    Like the little old lady handed a boiling
cup of hot coffee and who burned herself.

(with a hip hop beat)
Consumer beware
unless it is a cooking critic
and then that is no fair.

It makes me want to go back to the Texas humour.

REH


----- Original Message -----
From: "Brad McCormick, Ed.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harry Pollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] The free market in action? ~ A
McGedankenexperiment


> Harry Pollard wrote:
> > Brad,
> >
> > It's a face-off between a restaurant critic and 600,000 Italians who
> > each day eat McDonald's food.
>
> Somehow I did not read the piece as saying that 600,000
> angry Italians were pummeling one other Italian.
>
> It sounded like "men in Armani suits" from McHeadquarters
> earning their corporate salaries and fringe benefits by
> initiating a legal proceeding (you know, filing
> papers to try to get this guy's life ruined
> through means that leave no marks on the flesh....)
> via functionaries (Sartre's waiter: remember him?)
> who get their paychecks from another bureaucracy....
>
> It didn't sound like the McBacchae to me.  But maybe I
> got it wrong?
>
>  > You work it out, Brad. One restaurant
> > critic, who no doubt spends most of his time in the best restaurants and
> > 600,000 Italians who probably couldn't afford to enter those restaurants
> > where the critic spends his time.
>
> [snip]
>
>
> > While an intellectual may take the side of the critic, the people who
> > matter buy McDonald's by the billion. Definitely, mutually beneficial
> > intercourse.
>
> "The people who matter"?  An interesting description for
> the people who, as individuals, precisely *do not
> matter*, but who, by some magic, in vast aggregates,
> are, as you say, what matters.
>
> But we styill have not gotten to the bottom of the
> interaction between Joe Hungry and Sally Bagger (or
> Sally Hungry and Joe Bagger, etc. -- I'm EEO...)....
>
> Is Bagger operating in the same way behind the counter
> as Bagger operated *as an individual* (i.e., as
> Hungry)?  Let me give you an example: Bagger's identical
> twin (Baguette?). who either doesn't have a
> job, or else is doing a Laurie Anderson act,
> walks into the Mc, puts on a McUniform, and starts
> bagging burgers.  Now, in every detail
> except for the contingent attribute of being
> on the company's payroll, we can discern no
> difference between Bagger and Baguetts.  Question:
> If Bagger's shift starts at 8AM and Baguette starts
> bagging at 8AM, also, do Bagger and Baguette's
> days proceed more or less identically?  Or does
> McManager ask Baguette to leave (even though Baguette
> is in every way acting like a McEmployee!)?  And,
> if Baguette doesn't leave but keeps on bagging,
> doesn't McManager finally call the police?
> Whereas Bagger continues to bag all day -- indeed,
> if Bagger doesn't keep bagging all day, doesn't
> Bagger get fired?
>
> So I think there is something going on here
> besides the free consensual and mutually
> beneficial intercourse of individuals.
> Or do you disagree, Harry?
>
> (We can next proceed to see if there
> is any difference in what happens, when
> each of the following enters the Mc:
>
>      (1) Baguette (this time coming only to
>          purchase a burger as an individual
>          consumner,
>
>      (2) Bagman (you know, a "homeless person"), and
>
>      (3) A person who *looks* identical to
>          #1, but whom someone has tipped off
>          McUpperManagment that this person is
>          an agent of PETA or some other
>          institution, secretly collecting
>          "evidence" and not merely seeking
>          to injest colories.
> >
> > Isn't it?
> >
>
> \brad mccormick
>
>
> > Harry
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Brad wrote:
> >
> >> McDonalds in Italy is suing a food critic for
> >> saying McDonalds food doesn't taste good.
> >>
> >>
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=2853384&src=eD
ialog/GetContent
> >>
> >>
> >> Is this faceoff between the corporate hoard and one
> >> little mouse an example of what Harry
> >> talks about when he says that the free market is
> >> a place where persons always and only engage in mutually
> >> beneficial intercourse?
> >>
> >> All "persons" are created equal? --Whether it is
> >> a naked food critic or McGlobalCorp?
> >>
> >>     Humpety Dumpety sat on a wall
> >>     Humpety Dumpety had a great fall
> >>     All the kings lawyers and all the king's spin doctors
> >>     Proved that Humpety Dumpety never fell off at all.
> >>
> >> The "intelligence community" seems a bit displeased
> >> today with how Bush et Cie. jerked them around
> >> to make the case for attacking Saddam Hussein just
> >> because we wanted to but needed a reason to give to the
> >> public....
> >>
> >> \brad mccormick
> >
> >
> >
> > ****************************************************
> > Harry Pollard
> > Henry George School of Social Science of Los Angeles
> > Box 655   Tujunga   CA   91042
> > Tel: (818) 352-4141  --  Fax: (818) 353-2242
> > http://home.attbi.com/~haledward
> > ****************************************************
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.484 / Virus Database: 282 - Release Date: 5/27/2003
>
>
> --
>    Let your light so shine before men,
>                that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16)
>
>    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21)
>
> <![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>    Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to