Selma,

Your letter is well written and points are well made. 
My guess, however, is that Ray may feel a bit under-
appreciated in your denying that his is "intimidatory"

Bill

On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:46:42 -0400 "Selma Singer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Keith Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:29 AM
> Subject: [Futurework] Future plans
> 
> 
> Keith wrote:
> 
>  I  am also completely, thoroughly and utterly tired of constantly 
> seeing
> > postings about his ancestors or his emotive ravings about the 
> particular
> > sort of music he likes.
> 
> Selma:
> 
> Just for the record, I would like to state that Ray's discussion of 
> his
> ancestors has been, for me, enlightening and profoundly insightful.
> 
> There appears to be some agreement among some on this list ( you can 
> see
> that I am choosing my words carefully) that Western society (and all 
> those
> societies presently becoming 'Westernized' or Americanized' ) are 
> terribly
> deficient in a spiritual base of some sort; that a center of 
> morality and
> humanity just doesn't seem to be there and some will argue, like me, 
> that
> this is at the base of most if not all of our problems.
> 
> Ray's discussion of his ancestors is never just for the sake of 
> discussing
> his ancestors. It is always in a larger context of trying to reason 
> out what
> we can learn from culture(s) that do have a spiritual base and a 
> moral
> center and to compare the behavior in those cultures
> as it contrasts with our own.
> 
> As for Ray's 'emotive ravings about the particular sort of music he 
> likes'-
> those discussions  also are never for the reason of letting us know 
> what he
> likes or trying to persuade us to like what he likes- they are also, 
> always,
> in a context of trying to illustrate some larger principle that is 
> important
> for us to look at if we are to have some important understandings of 
> what is
> wrong-and perhaps, even, what may be right with our own culture.
> 
> It seems to me to be terribly pathetic and illustrative of precisely 
> that
> lack of moral and spiritual understanding I speak of above,  that 
> Ray's
> discussions of aesthetics as being basic to human and social 
> development can
> be dismissed as 'emotive ravings about a particular sort of music he 
> likes'.
> 
> 
> Keith:
> 
>  He is patronising and intimidatory, and I believe
> > that many other intelligent and thoughtful people would be 
> subscribers to
> > Futurework and could be writing here for all our benefit were it 
> not for
> > his long and rambling postings which are often impossible to 
> understand
> > unless you give each paragraph a great deal of study.
> 
> Selma:
> 
> I find Ray anything but patronizing and intimidatory. He has 
> demonstrated a
> kind of patience and understanding that I can only admire. I fully
> understand his frustration at having to deal with the kind of 
> responses he
> receives.
> 
> I have chosen to refuse to invest my time and energy as he does in 
> an
> attempt to contribute to a conversation that he keeps hoping will 
> lead to
> some important insights and understandings of human and social 
> behavior. I
> am somewhat older than Ray and perhaps my experience as a woman 
> makes me a
> little more aware of the kinds of conversations in which many 
> participants
> are more interested in proving they are right than in coming to any 
> real
> understanding of anything. There is a considerable literature that 
> testifies
> to this as being more a male characteristic than a female 
> characteristic. I
> have learned to conserve my energy and choose my fights as a result. 
> I have
> to admit that I sometimes have pangs of guilt that I am not trying 
> to give
> Ray a helping hand as he battles here.  But it has seemed to me to 
> be
> hopeless.
> 
> However, I read his posts avidly; I have no trouble understanding 
> what he is
> talking about; I have learned a great deal and understood so much 
> more than
> I did before I was lucky enough to encounter him on this list. Many 
> of the
> things he says are insights that just feel so true and right. If  I 
> ever
> write that definitive book of social theory I will owe him an 
> enormous debt
> for clarifying so much that should have been obvious but wasn't 
> until he
> expressed it as only he can.
> 
> Selma
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> 
> 

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to