On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:47:55PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:45:38PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > Please note that I have *not* revived any of the myriad of removed
> > gui modules, none of the scripts and not Xpm and Svg support (I'm
> > not comfortable with thee image formats being removed, but I'd
> > give it a try and maybe think about an on-the-fly converter
> > later).  And I also agree that eventually removen FvwmCpp is a good
> > thing if we find another way to provide its functionality.
> > 
> > In other words:  I'm not adding back just every random stuff I am
> > using, and I can think of some more stuff to remove (e.g. the
> > Repeat command).
> 
> Absolutely.  Feel free to tell me if I'm being too "anal".  :)

No, no, it is important that you argue about reviving any of the
removed stuff and remind me and others why they were removed.
After all we do want to get rid of the obsolete things, and if
necessary it's always possible to add things back later.

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt

Reply via email to