To be perfectly honest, Rob, if the standard library components will be the 
only part of ZF that is maintained over time and major releases, then we'll 
need to start scaling back our expectations of this project- and quick-like! 
Actually, I'd rather just build a reality where the extras library will deliver 
a lot of components that may be more useful, important, and possibly even more 
actively developed than some in the standard library. J

I would strongly recommend you look in to building compatibility with jQuery 
(and contributing it back!) if you have already made a significant investment 
in this toolkit and/or you happen to prefer it for whatever reason. The fact 
is, JS toolkits- like template systems, persistence layers, etc.- are built 
very differently with some working better than others for certain projects or 
developers. The last thing we want to do is force a developer to use any one 
technology when they feel there is a better one out there for them. Please, 
Rob, investigate jQuery/ZF compatibility, help a community effort to build 
support in to ZF, and then write a book about it.

BTW, I should take this opportunity to re-assert that extras library components 
will *not* be second-class citizens in ZF. The only effective difference is 
possibly in distribution (we might deliver a lean/mean package with no extras, 
unit tests, locale files, etc.) and support. We do not expect adoption of 
extras components to be affected by their inclusion in the extras library vs. 
the standard library. Ask yourself- if you really liked jQuery and it worked 
for you and your project, and there were a jQuery component for ZF in extras 
with the same quality guarantees as the standard library, and you didn't care 
that much about having full Zend support for every component in your project, 
would you choose Dojo simply because it was in the standard library? Maybe you 
would- fortunately it will be there for you too. ;)

 

,Wil

 

From: Rob Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 12:35 PM
To: Zend Framework General
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework and Dojo

 

 

On 21 May 2008, at 20:15, Pádraic Brady wrote:





It's really great news! And once the Dojo implementation is in place as a 
template it's an open field for someone to step up and do something similar for 
the lighter libraries like jQuery.

 

 

I wonder if this will actually happen long term?

 

I think you can essentially assume that most other JS/Ajax libraries won't be 
used with ZF by the majority of developers once the new Zend-Dojo stuff is 
released. There just won't be the same level of documentation, mailing list or 
irc help on how to do stuff compared to using Dojo. 

 

Even if the relevant components are written for another JS library, to adopt 
them you have to decide if they will be keep up with the official Zend-Dojo 
components over the years that follow. Who will maintain them and update them 
through ZF 2.0, 3.0 etc? This is the bit that would worry me about adopting 
something other than Dojo for use with ZF over the long term.

 

 

I'm planning on telling my developers at work that we need to migrate to Dojo 
over the next 6 months.  I had a look at the Dojo docs and at first glance they 
don't look as comprehensive as we've been used to, but I'm sure we'll manage.

 

 

Regards,

 

Rob...

Reply via email to