2008/10/10 Isaak Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In my opinion, those are some very unreliable benchmarks. > > Firstly, you should know that they probably included the whole ZFW package > in a script and benchmarked it, this is to make a general estimate of the > framework's performance and should not be trusted for production use. Did > you ever see a professional include the whole ZFW in their bootstrap? Well, > I have neither. > > Secondly, I don't see in any way that the performance could drop when using > APC caching. APC is supposed to cache pages/content into shared memory and > prevent them from being reparsed every request. I have no idea how they > performed the benchmark but this sounds very impossible. And the benchmark > package just contains a simple controller so it doesn't really show how they > did it. > > You should do some benchmarks of your website(s) without and with APC > caching and see for yourself. Of course, only use APC where it can be of > use. > > I bet they probably benchmarked with "keepalive off" on purpose or ran > several system virus scans while benchmarking the ZFW :-P > > -- > Isaak Malik > Web Developer >
The bare fact that they say the tests were run on a windows vista pc says much by itself :-) -- Regards, Martin Martinov http://mmartinov.com/
