You're viewing it from the viewpoint, that sentence was not about the scripting language itself not was it about the frameworks specifically. It was about the fact that web applications perform much worser on an everyday-computer vs a production server.
Since these benchmarks were performed on an everyday-computer they hold very little truth, not only because of the possibility of other running software inflicting the results (see my benchmarks) but also because these numbers would be much different from the benchmarks performed on a Linux production server. And if one would perform benchmarks on a Windows server then you should at least use the most common software combination of a real-time production server which would be Windows + IIS and not Windows + Apache. On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:46 PM, ekerazha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Martin Martinov-2 wrote: > > > > The bare fact that they say the tests were run on a windows vista pc > > says much by itself :-) > > > > Are you (and other professed software architects) saying that there's a > "Windows Vista-way" and a "Linux way" for PHP programming? PHP is a high > level interpreted language, should I believe that you have 2 different > software engineering strategies if you deploy a *PHP* application on a > Windows system or on a Linux system? "PHP for Linux": nice. Please, don't > let us laugh, that's just ridiculous. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Framework-speed-shotout----question-tp19914787p20293638.html > Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Isaak Malik Web Developer
