Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: > > You miss several important issues: it's not necessarily about testing on > Windows, it's the entire methodology. If you want to have a good > benchmark on windows, use a reasonable production environment: dedicated > machine, using IIS + FastCGI. Apache on Windows is notoriously > non-performant and unoptimized. Additionally, benching on a personal > box, and not one tuned for production, will have skewed results due to > having other applications and processes running. >
Really, what you call "important" is insignificant too, for the same reason I've already explained: every framework was running on Windows Vista with Apache, the environment was the same and it was a fair comparative. That "you should use IIS + FastCGI" argument is not relevant, every framework didn't use "IIS + FastCGI". "PHP for IIS + FastCGI" would be another nice label though ;-) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Framework-speed-shotout----question-tp19914787p20302597.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
